Assessing the support provided by a toolkit for rapid prototyping of multimodal systems

Fredy Cuenca, D. Vanacken, K. Coninx, K. Luyten
{"title":"Assessing the support provided by a toolkit for rapid prototyping of multimodal systems","authors":"Fredy Cuenca, D. Vanacken, K. Coninx, K. Luyten","doi":"10.1145/2494603.2480326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Choosing an appropriate toolkit for creating a multimodal interface is a cumbersome task. Several specialized toolkits include fusion and fission engines that allow developers to combine and decompose modalities to capture multimodal input and provide multimodal output. Unfortunately, the extent to which these toolkits can facilitate the creation of a multimodal interface is hard or impossible to estimate, due to the absence of a scale where the toolkit's capabilities can be measured on. In this paper, we propose a measurement scale, which allows the assessment of specialized toolkits without need for time-consuming testing or source code analysis. This scale is used to measure and compare the capabilities of three toolkits: CoGenIVE, HephaisTK and ICon.","PeriodicalId":163033,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Interactive Computing System","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Interactive Computing System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2494603.2480326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Choosing an appropriate toolkit for creating a multimodal interface is a cumbersome task. Several specialized toolkits include fusion and fission engines that allow developers to combine and decompose modalities to capture multimodal input and provide multimodal output. Unfortunately, the extent to which these toolkits can facilitate the creation of a multimodal interface is hard or impossible to estimate, due to the absence of a scale where the toolkit's capabilities can be measured on. In this paper, we propose a measurement scale, which allows the assessment of specialized toolkits without need for time-consuming testing or source code analysis. This scale is used to measure and compare the capabilities of three toolkits: CoGenIVE, HephaisTK and ICon.
评估多模式系统快速原型设计工具包提供的支持
为创建多模式界面选择合适的工具包是一项繁琐的任务。一些专门的工具包包括融合和裂变引擎,允许开发人员组合和分解模式,以捕获多模式输入并提供多模式输出。不幸的是,由于缺乏衡量工具包功能的尺度,这些工具包能够促进多模式界面的创建的程度很难或不可能估计。在本文中,我们提出了一个度量尺度,它允许评估专门的工具包,而不需要耗时的测试或源代码分析。该量表用于测量和比较三个工具包的能力:CoGenIVE, HephaisTK和ICon。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信