Comparative analysis of different methods for fruit quality determination

K. K. Patel, H. Patel, Prutha H. Patel
{"title":"Comparative analysis of different methods for fruit quality determination","authors":"K. K. Patel, H. Patel, Prutha H. Patel","doi":"10.1109/CCECE43985.2019.9052401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate and monitor the quality of fruits is of utmost importance in order to decide the shelf life and vending price of the fruits. Many different methods are utilized to determine the quality of fruits which can be broadly categorized as either objective methods or subjective methods. Objective methods involve use of instruments and are offer precise results whereas subjective methods use human senses and results may vary with the users. Depending on whether fruit is broken during analysis or remains undamaged, quality analysis methods can be grouped as either destructive or nondestructive methods. This paper presents a qualitative comparison of destructive as well as nondestructive methods utilized for quality analysis of fruits. Detailed review is presented about the research progress in the area of fruit quality analysis. Different methods consider diverse quality attributes and accordingly the selection of method for particular fruit quality analysis is conceded. Decisive comparison of most commonly used methods of quality analysis presented in this paper can facilitate analysts and researchers to carryout in-depth study of one or more specific methods and help the end users to select most appropriate method for their application area.","PeriodicalId":352860,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE43985.2019.9052401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate and monitor the quality of fruits is of utmost importance in order to decide the shelf life and vending price of the fruits. Many different methods are utilized to determine the quality of fruits which can be broadly categorized as either objective methods or subjective methods. Objective methods involve use of instruments and are offer precise results whereas subjective methods use human senses and results may vary with the users. Depending on whether fruit is broken during analysis or remains undamaged, quality analysis methods can be grouped as either destructive or nondestructive methods. This paper presents a qualitative comparison of destructive as well as nondestructive methods utilized for quality analysis of fruits. Detailed review is presented about the research progress in the area of fruit quality analysis. Different methods consider diverse quality attributes and accordingly the selection of method for particular fruit quality analysis is conceded. Decisive comparison of most commonly used methods of quality analysis presented in this paper can facilitate analysts and researchers to carryout in-depth study of one or more specific methods and help the end users to select most appropriate method for their application area.
不同果实品质测定方法的比较分析
调查和监测水果的质量对于决定水果的保质期和销售价格至关重要。许多不同的方法被用来确定水果的质量,可以大致分为客观方法和主观方法。客观方法涉及使用仪器并提供精确的结果,而主观方法使用人的感官,结果可能因用户而异。根据水果在分析过程中是否破碎或完好无损,质量分析方法可分为破坏性和非破坏性两大类。本文对用于水果品质分析的无损检测方法和破坏性检测方法进行了定性比较。综述了水果品质分析领域的研究进展。不同的方法考虑了不同的品质属性,因此对特定水果品质分析方法的选择是允许的。本文对最常用的质量分析方法进行决定性的比较,有利于分析人员和研究人员对一种或多种具体方法进行深入研究,帮助最终用户选择最适合其应用领域的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信