Decolonizing Knowledge: Biomedical Beliefs and Indigenous Medical Practice

Ronnie G Moore, S. McClean
{"title":"Decolonizing Knowledge: Biomedical Beliefs and Indigenous Medical Practice","authors":"Ronnie G Moore, S. McClean","doi":"10.1201/9780429487804-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical traditions and practices go back to antiquity and are defined by the cultures in which they emerge. We may regard these practices (health care systems) as profoundly personal and ethnocentric, tied to such things as religion and belief systems, kinship structures, local topography, environment and indigenous ethno-pharmacological practices, food and lifestyle. When we come to look at such practices temporally and spatially we see common themes, but also important variations. We also see trends, for example, dominant ideologies that drive and legitimate practice, thereby giving license to practice and defining authenticity. Western modernity emphasizes the notion of ‘science’ (essentially stemming from the European enlightenment) as the legitimating principle underpinning what has come to be called biomedicine. This paper is about what is regarded as ‘authentic’ medicine and considers the juxtaposition of folk medicine (and folk healing) with biomedicine. It will attempt to unpick some critical issues at the heart of the often-abrasive interface between the critical social sciences in medicine and modern Western dominated notions of ‘scientific’ biomedical practice.","PeriodicalId":429563,"journal":{"name":"Holistic Healthcare. Volume 2: Possibilities and Challenges","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Holistic Healthcare. Volume 2: Possibilities and Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429487804-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Medical traditions and practices go back to antiquity and are defined by the cultures in which they emerge. We may regard these practices (health care systems) as profoundly personal and ethnocentric, tied to such things as religion and belief systems, kinship structures, local topography, environment and indigenous ethno-pharmacological practices, food and lifestyle. When we come to look at such practices temporally and spatially we see common themes, but also important variations. We also see trends, for example, dominant ideologies that drive and legitimate practice, thereby giving license to practice and defining authenticity. Western modernity emphasizes the notion of ‘science’ (essentially stemming from the European enlightenment) as the legitimating principle underpinning what has come to be called biomedicine. This paper is about what is regarded as ‘authentic’ medicine and considers the juxtaposition of folk medicine (and folk healing) with biomedicine. It will attempt to unpick some critical issues at the heart of the often-abrasive interface between the critical social sciences in medicine and modern Western dominated notions of ‘scientific’ biomedical practice.
非殖民化知识:生物医学信仰和土著医疗实践
医学传统和实践可以追溯到古代,并由其产生的文化所定义。我们可以将这些做法(医疗保健系统)视为深刻的个人和种族中心主义,与宗教和信仰体系、亲属结构、当地地形、环境和土著民族药理学做法、食物和生活方式等因素联系在一起。当我们在时间和空间上观察这些实践时,我们看到了共同的主题,但也看到了重要的变化。我们也看到趋势,例如,主导的意识形态推动和合法的做法,从而给予许可证的做法和定义真实性。西方的现代性强调“科学”的概念(本质上源于欧洲启蒙运动)作为支撑所谓生物医学的合法化原则。这篇论文是关于什么被认为是“真正的”医学,并考虑了民间医学(和民间治疗)与生物医学的并列。它将试图在医学的关键社会科学和现代西方主导的“科学”生物医学实践概念之间经常磨擦的接口的核心部分解开一些关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信