Detection of maximal cerebral vasodilation by correlation of arterial and intracranial pressure signals

M. Daley, H. Pasupathy, J. Robertson, C. Leffler
{"title":"Detection of maximal cerebral vasodilation by correlation of arterial and intracranial pressure signals","authors":"M. Daley, H. Pasupathy, J. Robertson, C. Leffler","doi":"10.1109/IEMBS.1994.412063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall objective of this research is to develop tools which may improve the care of accident victims with severe closed head-injury. With the use of a laboratory model, arterial and intracranial pressure signals were obtained under conditions of intact regulation of cerebral blood flow and massive dilation. During elevated intracranial pressure and intact regulation, positive pressure inhalation appears to briefly occlude venous flow into the cranial sinuses during inspiration. As a result, the intracranial pressure and arterial pressure signals are not similar. In contrast, when maximal dilation causes failure of regulation of cerebral blood flow, the intracranial pressure signal is approximately proportional to the arterial pressure signal. Comparison of the cross-correlation function derived from the intracranial and arterial pressure signals to the autocorrelation function of the arterial signal reveals that the two correlation functions are: 1) different during intact autoregulation; and 2) nearly identical during dilation induced failure of regulation of cerebral blood flow.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":344622,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1994.412063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overall objective of this research is to develop tools which may improve the care of accident victims with severe closed head-injury. With the use of a laboratory model, arterial and intracranial pressure signals were obtained under conditions of intact regulation of cerebral blood flow and massive dilation. During elevated intracranial pressure and intact regulation, positive pressure inhalation appears to briefly occlude venous flow into the cranial sinuses during inspiration. As a result, the intracranial pressure and arterial pressure signals are not similar. In contrast, when maximal dilation causes failure of regulation of cerebral blood flow, the intracranial pressure signal is approximately proportional to the arterial pressure signal. Comparison of the cross-correlation function derived from the intracranial and arterial pressure signals to the autocorrelation function of the arterial signal reveals that the two correlation functions are: 1) different during intact autoregulation; and 2) nearly identical during dilation induced failure of regulation of cerebral blood flow.<>
动脉和颅内压信号的相关性检测脑血管最大舒张度
本研究的总体目标是开发可以改善严重闭合性头部损伤事故受害者护理的工具。利用实验室模型,在脑血流完整调节和大面积扩张的条件下,获得动脉和颅内压信号。在颅内压升高和调节完好的情况下,正压吸入似乎在吸气时短暂地阻断静脉流入颅窦。因此,颅内压和动脉压信号并不相似。相反,当最大扩张导致脑血流调节失败时,颅内压信号与动脉压信号近似成正比。将颅内压和动脉压信号的相互关联函数与动脉压信号的自相关函数进行比较,发现两者的相关函数有:1)在完整的自调节过程中是不同的;2)在扩张诱导的脑血流调节失效期间几乎相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信