A review of evaluation techniques for social dialogue systems

A. C. Curry, H. Hastie, Verena Rieser
{"title":"A review of evaluation techniques for social dialogue systems","authors":"A. C. Curry, H. Hastie, Verena Rieser","doi":"10.1145/3139491.3139504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contrast with goal-oriented dialogue, social dialogue has no clear measure of task success. Consequently, evaluation of these systems is notoriously hard. In this paper, we review current evaluation methods, focusing on automatic metrics. We conclude that turn-based metrics often ignore the context and do not account for the fact that several replies are valid, while end-of-dialogue rewards are mainly hand-crafted. Both lack grounding in human perceptions.","PeriodicalId":121205,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Investigating Social Interactions with Artificial Agents","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Investigating Social Interactions with Artificial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3139491.3139504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In contrast with goal-oriented dialogue, social dialogue has no clear measure of task success. Consequently, evaluation of these systems is notoriously hard. In this paper, we review current evaluation methods, focusing on automatic metrics. We conclude that turn-based metrics often ignore the context and do not account for the fact that several replies are valid, while end-of-dialogue rewards are mainly hand-crafted. Both lack grounding in human perceptions.
社会对话系统评价技术综述
与目标导向对话相比,社会对话没有明确的任务成功衡量标准。因此,对这些系统的评估是出了名的困难。在本文中,我们回顾了当前的评估方法,重点是自动度量。我们的结论是,基于回合制的参数通常会忽略上下文,并且不会考虑到某些回复是有效的这一事实,而对话结束奖励则主要是手工制作的。两者都缺乏人类认知的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信