Cost comparison of different translucent optical network architectures

M. D. Groote, K. Manousakis, P. Kokkinos, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, K. Christodoulopoulos, Emmanouel Varvarigos, P. Demeester
{"title":"Cost comparison of different translucent optical network architectures","authors":"M. D. Groote, K. Manousakis, P. Kokkinos, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, K. Christodoulopoulos, Emmanouel Varvarigos, P. Demeester","doi":"10.1109/CTTE.2010.5557697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever-increasing bandwidth demands and higher flexibility are the main challenges for the next generation optical core networks. A new trend in order to address these challenges is to consider the impairments of the lightpaths during the design of optical networks. In our work, we focus on translucent optical networks, where some lightpaths are routed transparently, whereas others go through a number of regenerators. We present a cost analysis of design strategies, which are based either on an exact Quality of Transmission (QoT) validation or on a relaxed one and attempt to reduce the amount of regenerators used. In the exact design strategy, regenerators are required if the QoT of a candidate lightpath is below a predefined threshold, assuming empty network conditions. In the relaxed strategy, this predefined threshold is lower, while it is assumed that the network is fully loaded. We evaluate techno-economically the suggested design solutions and also show that adding more flexibility to the optical nodes has a large impact to the total infrastructure cost.","PeriodicalId":269841,"journal":{"name":"2010 9th Conference of Telecommunication, Media and Internet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 9th Conference of Telecommunication, Media and Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTTE.2010.5557697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Ever-increasing bandwidth demands and higher flexibility are the main challenges for the next generation optical core networks. A new trend in order to address these challenges is to consider the impairments of the lightpaths during the design of optical networks. In our work, we focus on translucent optical networks, where some lightpaths are routed transparently, whereas others go through a number of regenerators. We present a cost analysis of design strategies, which are based either on an exact Quality of Transmission (QoT) validation or on a relaxed one and attempt to reduce the amount of regenerators used. In the exact design strategy, regenerators are required if the QoT of a candidate lightpath is below a predefined threshold, assuming empty network conditions. In the relaxed strategy, this predefined threshold is lower, while it is assumed that the network is fully loaded. We evaluate techno-economically the suggested design solutions and also show that adding more flexibility to the optical nodes has a large impact to the total infrastructure cost.
不同半透明光网络架构的成本比较
不断增长的带宽需求和更高的灵活性是下一代光核心网面临的主要挑战。为了应对这些挑战,在设计光网络时考虑光路的损伤是一个新的趋势。在我们的工作中,我们专注于半透明光网络,其中一些光路是透明的路由,而其他光路则通过许多再生器。我们提出了设计策略的成本分析,这些策略要么基于精确的传输质量(QoT)验证,要么基于宽松的验证,并试图减少蓄热器的使用量。在精确的设计策略中,如果候选光路的QoT低于预定义的阈值,假设网络条件为空,则需要再生器。在宽松策略中,这个预定义的阈值较低,同时假设网络是满载的。我们对建议的设计方案进行了技术经济评估,并表明增加光节点的灵活性对总基础设施成本有很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信