Evaluation of Human Factor Effect for the Accuracy of 3D Models of Heritage Science

P. D. Badillo, Yara Jabr, V. Parfenov
{"title":"Evaluation of Human Factor Effect for the Accuracy of 3D Models of Heritage Science","authors":"P. D. Badillo, Yara Jabr, V. Parfenov","doi":"10.1109/scm55405.2022.9794843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"3D laser and optical scanning technologies are invaluable tools in metrology applications, covering requirements of the most diverse fields of the scientific activity being Cultural Heritage Science (CH) one of them, where researchers and practitioners rapidly implemented their use allowing them to create highly accurate digital 3D models of real-life objects while preserving the objects condition thanks to their non-destructive working principle. Nonetheless, creation of 3D models starting from scanning procedures involves complex and time-demanding post-processing tasks that must be done by highly trained professionals who use different available tools to reach the final output and, as a consequence of this, the results might greatly differ in terms of reproduction accuracy, important requirement in CH field both in terms of measurement accuracy and observer’s perceived reproduction quality, depending on the application in which the resultant model will be used. Along this work, in which the scientific novelty resides in the study of the influence of the human factor over the accuracy of the creation of 3D models of objects of CH, we compare the results of three different post-processing procedures done by different operators with distinct experience in the area, we study the tools employed in each case, the main differences that feature the results and investigate how a common agreement is needed to try to reduce the gap between the finished models, in the search of reducing to a minimum the so-called human factor in creation of digital 3D objects for CH.","PeriodicalId":162457,"journal":{"name":"2022 XXV International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 XXV International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/scm55405.2022.9794843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

3D laser and optical scanning technologies are invaluable tools in metrology applications, covering requirements of the most diverse fields of the scientific activity being Cultural Heritage Science (CH) one of them, where researchers and practitioners rapidly implemented their use allowing them to create highly accurate digital 3D models of real-life objects while preserving the objects condition thanks to their non-destructive working principle. Nonetheless, creation of 3D models starting from scanning procedures involves complex and time-demanding post-processing tasks that must be done by highly trained professionals who use different available tools to reach the final output and, as a consequence of this, the results might greatly differ in terms of reproduction accuracy, important requirement in CH field both in terms of measurement accuracy and observer’s perceived reproduction quality, depending on the application in which the resultant model will be used. Along this work, in which the scientific novelty resides in the study of the influence of the human factor over the accuracy of the creation of 3D models of objects of CH, we compare the results of three different post-processing procedures done by different operators with distinct experience in the area, we study the tools employed in each case, the main differences that feature the results and investigate how a common agreement is needed to try to reduce the gap between the finished models, in the search of reducing to a minimum the so-called human factor in creation of digital 3D objects for CH.
人为因素对文物科学三维模型精度的影响评价
3D激光和光学扫描技术是计量应用中非常宝贵的工具,涵盖了文化遗产科学(CH)等科学活动最多样化领域的要求,研究人员和从业人员迅速实施了他们的使用,使他们能够创建高度精确的现实生活对象的数字3D模型,同时由于其非破坏性的工作原理而保持了对象的状态。尽管如此,从扫描程序开始创建3D模型涉及复杂且耗时的后处理任务,必须由训练有素的专业人员完成,他们使用不同的可用工具来达到最终输出,因此,结果可能在复制精度方面存在很大差异,这是CH领域在测量精度和观察者感知复制质量方面的重要要求。取决于将在其中使用结果模型的应用程序。沿着这工作,科学新颖驻留在对人类的影响因素的研究,建立3 d模型的准确性CH的对象,我们比较三种不同的后处理程序的结果由不同的运营商在该地区有独特的经验,我们研究在每种情况下,使用的工具的主要差异特性结果,探讨如何共同协议需要尽量减少之间的差距模型,完成在为CH创建数字3D对象时,寻求将所谓的人为因素减少到最低限度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信