BASELINE

E. Teng, P. Manser, S. S. Bohorquez, K. Wildsmith, K. Pickthorn, S. Baker, M. Ward, G. Kerchner, R. Weimer
{"title":"BASELINE","authors":"E. Teng, P. Manser, S. S. Bohorquez, K. Wildsmith, K. Pickthorn, S. Baker, M. Ward, G. Kerchner, R. Weimer","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv19shhms.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The role and implementation of tau PET imaging for predicting subsequent cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains uncertain. This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between baseline [F] GTP1 tau PET and subsequent longitudinal change across multiple cognitive measures over 18 months. Methods: Our analyses incorporated data from 67 participants, including cognitively normal controls (n = 10) and β-amyloid (Aβ)-positive individuals ([F] florbetapir Aβ PET) with prodromal (n = 26), mild (n = 16), or moderate (n = 15) AD. Baseline measurements included cortical volume (MRI), tau burden ([F]GTP1 tau PET), and cognitive assessments [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), 13-item version of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13), and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)]. Cognitive assessments were repeated at 6-month intervals over an 18-month period. Associations between baseline [F]GTP1 tau PET indices and longitudinal cognitive performance were assessed via univariate (Spearman correlations) and multivariate (linear mixed effects models) approaches. The utility of potential prognostic tau PET cut points was assessed with ROC curves. Results: Univariate analyses indicated that greater baseline [F]GTP1 tau PET signal was associated with faster rates of subsequent decline on the MMSE, CDR, and ADAS-Cog13 across regions of interest (ROIs). In multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline age, cognitive performance, cortical volume, and Aβ PET SUVR, the prognostic performance of [F]GTP1 SUVR was most robust in the whole cortical gray ROI. When AD participants were dichotomized into low versus high tau subgroups based on baseline [F]GTP1 PET standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) in the temporal (cutoff = 1.325) or whole cortical gray (cutoff = 1.245) ROIs, high tau subgroups demonstrated significantly more decline on the MMSE, CDR, and ADAS-Cog13. Conclusions: Our results suggest that [F]GTP1 tau PET represents a prognostic biomarker in AD and are consistent with data from other tau PET tracers. Tau PET imaging may have utility for identifying AD patients at risk for more rapid cognitive decline and for stratification and/or enrichment of participant selection in AD clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":314085,"journal":{"name":"The Cyber Security Handbook","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cyber Security Handbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19shhms.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role and implementation of tau PET imaging for predicting subsequent cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains uncertain. This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between baseline [F] GTP1 tau PET and subsequent longitudinal change across multiple cognitive measures over 18 months. Methods: Our analyses incorporated data from 67 participants, including cognitively normal controls (n = 10) and β-amyloid (Aβ)-positive individuals ([F] florbetapir Aβ PET) with prodromal (n = 26), mild (n = 16), or moderate (n = 15) AD. Baseline measurements included cortical volume (MRI), tau burden ([F]GTP1 tau PET), and cognitive assessments [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), 13-item version of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13), and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)]. Cognitive assessments were repeated at 6-month intervals over an 18-month period. Associations between baseline [F]GTP1 tau PET indices and longitudinal cognitive performance were assessed via univariate (Spearman correlations) and multivariate (linear mixed effects models) approaches. The utility of potential prognostic tau PET cut points was assessed with ROC curves. Results: Univariate analyses indicated that greater baseline [F]GTP1 tau PET signal was associated with faster rates of subsequent decline on the MMSE, CDR, and ADAS-Cog13 across regions of interest (ROIs). In multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline age, cognitive performance, cortical volume, and Aβ PET SUVR, the prognostic performance of [F]GTP1 SUVR was most robust in the whole cortical gray ROI. When AD participants were dichotomized into low versus high tau subgroups based on baseline [F]GTP1 PET standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) in the temporal (cutoff = 1.325) or whole cortical gray (cutoff = 1.245) ROIs, high tau subgroups demonstrated significantly more decline on the MMSE, CDR, and ADAS-Cog13. Conclusions: Our results suggest that [F]GTP1 tau PET represents a prognostic biomarker in AD and are consistent with data from other tau PET tracers. Tau PET imaging may have utility for identifying AD patients at risk for more rapid cognitive decline and for stratification and/or enrichment of participant selection in AD clinical trials.
基线
背景:tau PET成像在预测阿尔茨海默病(AD)随后认知能力下降中的作用和实施仍不确定。本研究旨在评估基线[F] GTP1 tau PET与随后18个月多项认知测量的纵向变化之间的关系。方法:我们的分析纳入了67名参与者的数据,包括认知正常的对照组(n = 10)和β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)阳性个体([F] florbetapir Aβ PET),患有前期(n = 26)、轻度(n = 16)或中度(n = 15) AD。基线测量包括皮质体积(MRI)、tau负担([F]GTP1 tau PET)和认知评估[迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、临床痴呆评分(CDR)、13项版本的阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表(ADAS-Cog13)和神经心理状态评估可重复电池(RBANS)]。认知能力评估在18个月的时间里每隔6个月重复一次。基线[F]GTP1 tau PET指数与纵向认知表现之间的关系通过单因素(Spearman相关性)和多因素(线性混合效应模型)方法进行评估。使用ROC曲线评估潜在预后tau PET切点的效用。结果:单因素分析表明,基线[F]GTP1 tau PET信号越高,MMSE、CDR和ADAS-Cog13随后在感兴趣区域(roi)的下降速度越快。在对基线年龄、认知能力、皮质体积和Aβ PET SUVR进行校正的多变量分析中,[F]GTP1 SUVR在整个皮质灰色ROI中的预后表现最为稳健。当AD参与者根据基线[F]GTP1 PET标准化摄取值比(SUVR)在时间(截止值= 1.325)或整个皮质灰色(截止值= 1.245)roi将其分为低tau和高tau亚组时,高tau亚组在MMSE, CDR和ADAS-Cog13上表现出明显更多的下降。结论:我们的研究结果表明[F]GTP1 tau PET代表AD的预后生物标志物,并且与其他tau PET示踪剂的数据一致。Tau PET成像可能有助于识别有认知能力快速下降风险的AD患者,并有助于分层和/或丰富AD临床试验中的参与者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信