{"title":"腰椎偽性定位症候:病例報告及文獻回顧","authors":"王大鈞 王大鈞, 蔡明成 蔡明成","doi":"10.53106/181020932022092003004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 根據患者的臨床表現、仔細的神經學及影像學上的檢查可以很容易將病灶在病患身體的相對位置做出很好的定位。這即是醫學教育上所標榜的精準定位。越是精細的手術,術前精準的定位越是重要。手術前的定位標記就是為了避免開錯邊的手術發生。尤其對於目前被廣泛使用的脊椎微創內視鏡手術而言,錯誤的定位不僅將導致手術的失敗,更可能衍生出醫療糾紛。在本報告中,我們介紹了一個罕見的腰椎定位錯誤的病例。根據病患臨床表現及神經學檢查所定的位置竟然與核磁共振攝影的影像不同。這種差異帶給了微創手術莫大的困擾。我們探查之前曾發表過的文獻,對於發生於腰椎的這種偽性定位症候的病例報告極少。在本報告中,我們將探討其可能涉及的機制並進行相關文獻之回顧。\n Based on a patient’s presentation, careful neurologic examinations and radiographic data may be employed to identify pathological lesions. From a surgical standpoint, the laterality of lesions always influences surgical planning and results. Precise localization is crucial for the success of the commonly preferred minimally invasive surgeries. False localization can undercut such efforts. Even though we strive to confirm lesions before operating, false localization may still occur. In this report, we present a case of a patient with false localizing signs on the lumbar spine. The signs of localization of lumbar radiculopathy differed between presenting symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging scans. This discrepancy posed difficulties in deciding on the surgical approach. There were no published case reports on false localization signs at the lumbar spine before. In this report, we discuss the possible mechanisms involved and review the relevant literature.\n \n","PeriodicalId":188376,"journal":{"name":"輔仁醫學期刊","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"輔仁醫學期刊","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/181020932022092003004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
根據患者的臨床表現、仔細的神經學及影像學上的檢查可以很容易將病灶在病患身體的相對位置做出很好的定位。這即是醫學教育上所標榜的精準定位。越是精細的手術,術前精準的定位越是重要。手術前的定位標記就是為了避免開錯邊的手術發生。尤其對於目前被廣泛使用的脊椎微創內視鏡手術而言,錯誤的定位不僅將導致手術的失敗,更可能衍生出醫療糾紛。在本報告中,我們介紹了一個罕見的腰椎定位錯誤的病例。根據病患臨床表現及神經學檢查所定的位置竟然與核磁共振攝影的影像不同。這種差異帶給了微創手術莫大的困擾。我們探查之前曾發表過的文獻,對於發生於腰椎的這種偽性定位症候的病例報告極少。在本報告中,我們將探討其可能涉及的機制並進行相關文獻之回顧。
Based on a patient’s presentation, careful neurologic examinations and radiographic data may be employed to identify pathological lesions. From a surgical standpoint, the laterality of lesions always influences surgical planning and results. Precise localization is crucial for the success of the commonly preferred minimally invasive surgeries. False localization can undercut such efforts. Even though we strive to confirm lesions before operating, false localization may still occur. In this report, we present a case of a patient with false localizing signs on the lumbar spine. The signs of localization of lumbar radiculopathy differed between presenting symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging scans. This discrepancy posed difficulties in deciding on the surgical approach. There were no published case reports on false localization signs at the lumbar spine before. In this report, we discuss the possible mechanisms involved and review the relevant literature.
根据患者的临床表现、仔细的神经学及影像学上的检查可以很容易将病灶在病患身体的相对位置做出很好的定位。这即是医学教育上所标榜的精准定位。越是精细的手术,术前精准的定位越是重要。手术前的定位标记就是为了避免开错边的手术发生。尤其对于目前被广泛使用的脊椎微创内视镜手术而言,错误的定位不仅将导致手术的失败,更可能衍生出医疗纠纷。在本报告中,我们介绍了一个罕见的腰椎定位错误的病例。根据病患临床表现及神经学检查所定的位置竟然与核磁共振摄影的影像不同。这种差异带给了微创手术莫大的困扰。我们探查之前曾发表过的文献,对于发生于腰椎的这种伪性定位症候的病例报告极少。在本报告中,我们将探讨其可能涉及的机制并进行相关文献之回顾。 Based on a patient’s presentation, careful neurologic examinations and radiographic data may be employed to identify pathological lesions. From a surgical standpoint, the laterality of lesions always influences surgical planning and results. Precise localization is crucial for the success of the commonly preferred minimally invasive surgeries. False localization can undercut such efforts. Even though we strive to confirm lesions before operating, false localization may still occur. In this report, we present a case of a patient with false localizing signs on the lumbar spine. The signs of localization of lumbar radiculopathy differed between presenting symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging scans. This discrepancy posed difficulties in deciding on the surgical approach. There were no published case reports on false localization signs at the lumbar spine before. In this report, we discuss the possible mechanisms involved and review the relevant literature.