Twitter Sentiment Analysis using an Ensemble Weighted Majority Vote Classifier

R. H. H. Aziz, Nazife Dimililer
{"title":"Twitter Sentiment Analysis using an Ensemble Weighted Majority Vote Classifier","authors":"R. H. H. Aziz, Nazife Dimililer","doi":"10.1109/ICOASE51841.2020.9436590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentiment analysis extracts the emotions expressed in text and has been employed in many fields including politics, elections, movies, retail businesses and in recent years microblogs to understand, track and control the human sentiments or reactions toward products events or ideas. Nevertheless challenges such as different styles of writing, use of negation and sarcasm, existence of spelling mistakes, invention of new words etc. provide obstacle in the correct classification of sentiments. This paper provides an ensemble of classifiers framework for sentiment analysis. The proposed weighted majority voting ensemble method combines six models including Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Random Forest, Decision Tree and Support Vector Machine to form a single classifier. Weights of the individual classifiers of the ensemble are chosen as accuracy or Fl-score by optimizing their performance. This approach combines models based on the simple majority voting as opposed to the one based on weighted majority voting. Additionally, a comparison is drawn among these six individual classifiers to evaluate their performance. The proposed ensemble model is tested on some existing sentiment datasets, including SemEval 2017 Task 4A, 4B and 4C. The results demonstrate that the Logistic Regression classifier is optimal as compared to other individual classifiers. Furthermore, the proposed ensemble weighted majority voting classifier with the six individual classifiers performs better compared to the simple majority voting and all independent classifiers.","PeriodicalId":126112,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Advanced Science and Engineering (ICOASE)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Advanced Science and Engineering (ICOASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOASE51841.2020.9436590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Sentiment analysis extracts the emotions expressed in text and has been employed in many fields including politics, elections, movies, retail businesses and in recent years microblogs to understand, track and control the human sentiments or reactions toward products events or ideas. Nevertheless challenges such as different styles of writing, use of negation and sarcasm, existence of spelling mistakes, invention of new words etc. provide obstacle in the correct classification of sentiments. This paper provides an ensemble of classifiers framework for sentiment analysis. The proposed weighted majority voting ensemble method combines six models including Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Random Forest, Decision Tree and Support Vector Machine to form a single classifier. Weights of the individual classifiers of the ensemble are chosen as accuracy or Fl-score by optimizing their performance. This approach combines models based on the simple majority voting as opposed to the one based on weighted majority voting. Additionally, a comparison is drawn among these six individual classifiers to evaluate their performance. The proposed ensemble model is tested on some existing sentiment datasets, including SemEval 2017 Task 4A, 4B and 4C. The results demonstrate that the Logistic Regression classifier is optimal as compared to other individual classifiers. Furthermore, the proposed ensemble weighted majority voting classifier with the six individual classifiers performs better compared to the simple majority voting and all independent classifiers.
使用集成加权多数投票分类器的Twitter情感分析
情感分析提取文本中表达的情感,并已被用于许多领域,包括政治、选举、电影、零售业务,以及近年来的微博,以了解、跟踪和控制人类对产品、事件或想法的情绪或反应。然而,不同的写作风格、否定和讽刺的使用、拼写错误的存在、新单词的发明等挑战为正确分类情感提供了障碍。本文提供了一个用于情感分析的分类器集成框架。提出的加权多数投票集成方法将Naïve贝叶斯、逻辑回归、随机梯度下降、随机森林、决策树和支持向量机等6种模型结合在一起,形成一个单一的分类器。通过优化单个分类器的性能,选择其权重为准确率或fl分。这种方法结合了基于简单多数投票的模型,而不是基于加权多数投票的模型。此外,还对这六个分类器进行了比较,以评估它们的性能。提出的集成模型在一些现有的情感数据集上进行了测试,包括SemEval 2017 Task 4A, 4B和4C。结果表明,与其他单个分类器相比,逻辑回归分类器是最优的。此外,与简单多数投票和所有独立分类器相比,所提出的具有六个独立分类器的集成加权多数投票分类器表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信