Tax Systems in Transition Economies

J. Martínez-Vázquez, R. McNab
{"title":"Tax Systems in Transition Economies","authors":"J. Martínez-Vázquez, R. McNab","doi":"10.4324/9781315093161-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an overview of taxation in the transitional economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. The governments of transitional economies have been implementingsimultaneous reforms of legal, political, and economic institutions, reforms which are dependent upon the ability of the emerging tax systems to efficiently enforce the tax system. As the transitional process continues, we are able to identify characteristics of successful reform programs, and note the common problems that hinder implementation of more stable tax systems. The discussion covers 4 main issues: the enduring legacy of centralized tax systems, the general direction and timing of tax reform, the tax policies of the transitional period, and thoughts about the path of reform in the future.In the Centrally Planned Economy (CPE), taxes were viewed as an instrument to manage cash flows and to fulfill the budget plan. Taxes were often retroactively adjusted to meet perceived expenditure needs. In many cases, the final tax liability of an enterprise was more dependent upon its ability to negotiate with the financial administration than tax law. Private activity was taxed at exorbitant rates and in most cases, citizens were unaware of taxation. Tax administration was simplified by the central role of the government in the economy and the control over the payment system.The path and timing of reform had to address the legacy of the previous system and determine the structure of the transitional tax system. Two major options were considered,a transitional system of taxesthat would be relatively simple to administer and provide broad coverage of the economy, and a system that would replicate most features of Western tax systems. The most common adoption of the latter system led to substantialproblems, although over time there has been convergence towards sensible tax structures. Yet, the gains of the last 4 to 6 years are endangered by the almost universal lack ofprogress in the reform and modernization of tax administrations. While governments have been able to adopt andevolve their Western oriented tax systems with relative ease, the lack of a significant commitment to modernize existing tax administrations has led to higher tax evasion and low rates of revenue mobilization.Only recently, as governments face substantial fiscal deficits resulting for low rates of revenue mobilization, is more attention being paid to tax administration.","PeriodicalId":162353,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Taxation","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093161-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of taxation in the transitional economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. The governments of transitional economies have been implementingsimultaneous reforms of legal, political, and economic institutions, reforms which are dependent upon the ability of the emerging tax systems to efficiently enforce the tax system. As the transitional process continues, we are able to identify characteristics of successful reform programs, and note the common problems that hinder implementation of more stable tax systems. The discussion covers 4 main issues: the enduring legacy of centralized tax systems, the general direction and timing of tax reform, the tax policies of the transitional period, and thoughts about the path of reform in the future.In the Centrally Planned Economy (CPE), taxes were viewed as an instrument to manage cash flows and to fulfill the budget plan. Taxes were often retroactively adjusted to meet perceived expenditure needs. In many cases, the final tax liability of an enterprise was more dependent upon its ability to negotiate with the financial administration than tax law. Private activity was taxed at exorbitant rates and in most cases, citizens were unaware of taxation. Tax administration was simplified by the central role of the government in the economy and the control over the payment system.The path and timing of reform had to address the legacy of the previous system and determine the structure of the transitional tax system. Two major options were considered,a transitional system of taxesthat would be relatively simple to administer and provide broad coverage of the economy, and a system that would replicate most features of Western tax systems. The most common adoption of the latter system led to substantialproblems, although over time there has been convergence towards sensible tax structures. Yet, the gains of the last 4 to 6 years are endangered by the almost universal lack ofprogress in the reform and modernization of tax administrations. While governments have been able to adopt andevolve their Western oriented tax systems with relative ease, the lack of a significant commitment to modernize existing tax administrations has led to higher tax evasion and low rates of revenue mobilization.Only recently, as governments face substantial fiscal deficits resulting for low rates of revenue mobilization, is more attention being paid to tax administration.
转型经济中的税收制度
本文概述了中欧、东欧和前苏联转型经济国家的税收情况。转型经济体的政府一直在同时实施法律、政治和经济制度的改革,这些改革依赖于新兴税收制度有效执行税收制度的能力。随着过渡进程的继续,我们能够识别成功改革方案的特点,并注意到阻碍实施更稳定的税收制度的共同问题。围绕集中税制的遗留问题、税制改革的大方向和时机、过渡期的税收政策以及对未来改革路径的思考等4个问题展开讨论。在中央计划经济(CPE)中,税收被视为管理现金流和完成预算计划的工具。税收经常被追溯调整以满足预期的支出需要。在许多情况下,企业的最终纳税义务更多地取决于其与财务管理部门谈判的能力,而不是税法。私人活动被课以过高的税率,在大多数情况下,公民不知道纳税。政府在经济中的中心作用和对支付系统的控制简化了税收管理。改革的途径和时机必须解决以前制度的遗留问题,并确定过渡税收制度的结构。他们考虑了两种主要的选择,一种是过渡税制,这种税制管理起来相对简单,覆盖了整个经济;另一种是复制西方税制的大部分特点。后一种制度的最普遍采用导致了实质性的问题,尽管随着时间的推移,已经趋同于合理的税收结构。然而,由于税收管理改革和现代化几乎普遍缺乏进展,过去4至6年的成果受到威胁。虽然各国政府已经能够相对容易地采用和下放其西方导向的税收制度,但缺乏对现有税收管理现代化的重大承诺,导致了更高的逃税率和较低的收入动员率。直到最近,由于各国政府面临巨额财政赤字,导致收入调动率低,人们才更多地注意到税收管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信