Argument in Bargaining: An Analysis of the Reasoning Process.

Linda L. Putnam, Patricia Geist
{"title":"Argument in Bargaining: An Analysis of the Reasoning Process.","authors":"Linda L. Putnam, Patricia Geist","doi":"10.1080/10417948509372633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bargaining is accomplished through arguments and persuasive appeals. This study aims to understand the way argumentation in bargaining shapes outcomes. It examines the types of claims and reasoning processes that characterize bargaining interaction on different subissues of a proposal. It tracks the development of arguments through sequential sessions and caucus meetings by examining similarities and differences in the reasoning process on subissues that are dropped, modified, or retained in the final agreement. The issues and subissues examined in this study emanate from problems teachers faced in organizational communication. Thus, in studying argumentation in bargaining, we are examining variables that grow out of and affect the daily routines of organizational members.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Bargaining is accomplished through arguments and persuasive appeals. This study aims to understand the way argumentation in bargaining shapes outcomes. It examines the types of claims and reasoning processes that characterize bargaining interaction on different subissues of a proposal. It tracks the development of arguments through sequential sessions and caucus meetings by examining similarities and differences in the reasoning process on subissues that are dropped, modified, or retained in the final agreement. The issues and subissues examined in this study emanate from problems teachers faced in organizational communication. Thus, in studying argumentation in bargaining, we are examining variables that grow out of and affect the daily routines of organizational members.
议价中的争论:推理过程的分析。
讨价还价是通过争论和有说服力的呼吁来完成的。本研究旨在了解议价过程中争论对结果的影响。它考察了在提案的不同子问题上表征议价互动的索赔和推理过程的类型。它通过检查在最终协议中删除、修改或保留的子问题的推理过程中的异同点,通过连续的会议和核心小组会议来跟踪争论的发展。本研究检视的问题和子问题源自教师在组织沟通中所面临的问题。因此,在研究议价中的争论时,我们正在研究产生并影响组织成员日常生活的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信