Identification of Students' Misconceptions on Hydrocarbon Material Using a Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test

Reni Arif Karini, Retno Aliyatul Fikroh*, Vika Puji Cahyani
{"title":"Identification of Students' Misconceptions on Hydrocarbon Material Using a Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test","authors":"Reni Arif Karini, Retno Aliyatul Fikroh*, Vika Puji Cahyani","doi":"10.23887/jpki.v6i2.39022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one of the sciences, some students consider chemistry complex and abstract, so many misconceptions arise. One of the chemistry topics that cause many misconceptions is hydrocarbons. A misconception is an understanding of concepts in students' minds that are contrary to scientific concepts. This research aimed to identify the student’s understanding and misconception of hydrocarbon. The study was qualitative descriptive research. Qualitative descriptive research was used to identify student misconceptions using the four-tier test. The sample of the research was 24 students. The instruments used in this research are four test levels which include (1) multiple-choice, (2) confidence rating of the answer beliefs, (3) reason for the answer, and (4) confidence rating of the reasoning. The result shows that 24,7% of students well-understood hydrocarbon concepts, 32,1% do not understand, and 43,2% have misconceptions. Misconceptions in this research are divided into three categories: low, moderate, and high. The students experience misconceptions with high criteria on the concept reaction of hydrocarbon (66,7%), moderate criteria on the concept of determining hydrocarbon compound (31,3%), the nomenclature of hydrocarbon compound (56,3%), types atom carbon (37,5%), Physical and Chemical Properties (45,8%), isomers (47,9%) and low criteria on the concept of characteristics of carbon atoms (16,7%).","PeriodicalId":296575,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v6i2.39022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As one of the sciences, some students consider chemistry complex and abstract, so many misconceptions arise. One of the chemistry topics that cause many misconceptions is hydrocarbons. A misconception is an understanding of concepts in students' minds that are contrary to scientific concepts. This research aimed to identify the student’s understanding and misconception of hydrocarbon. The study was qualitative descriptive research. Qualitative descriptive research was used to identify student misconceptions using the four-tier test. The sample of the research was 24 students. The instruments used in this research are four test levels which include (1) multiple-choice, (2) confidence rating of the answer beliefs, (3) reason for the answer, and (4) confidence rating of the reasoning. The result shows that 24,7% of students well-understood hydrocarbon concepts, 32,1% do not understand, and 43,2% have misconceptions. Misconceptions in this research are divided into three categories: low, moderate, and high. The students experience misconceptions with high criteria on the concept reaction of hydrocarbon (66,7%), moderate criteria on the concept of determining hydrocarbon compound (31,3%), the nomenclature of hydrocarbon compound (56,3%), types atom carbon (37,5%), Physical and Chemical Properties (45,8%), isomers (47,9%) and low criteria on the concept of characteristics of carbon atoms (16,7%).
用四层选择诊断测验识别学生对碳氢化合物材料的误解
作为一门科学,一些学生认为化学复杂而抽象,因此产生了许多误解。引起许多误解的化学主题之一是碳氢化合物。误解是学生头脑中对与科学概念相反的概念的理解。本研究旨在找出学生对碳氢化合物的认识和误解。本研究为定性描述性研究。定性描述性研究使用四层测试来识别学生的误解。这项研究的样本是24名学生。本研究中使用的工具有四个测试水平,包括(1)选择题,(2)答案信念的置信度,(3)答案的原因,(4)推理的置信度。结果表明,24.7%的学生对烃类概念有很好的理解,32.1%的学生不理解,43.2%的学生有误解。本研究中的误解分为三类:低、中、高。学生在烃类反应概念(66,7%)、确定烃类化合物概念(31,3%)、烃类化合物的命名(56,3%)、碳原子类型(37,5%)、物理化学性质(45,8%)、异构体(47.9%)和碳原子特征概念(16,7%)上存在较低标准的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信