Assessment of product maintainability for two space domain simulators

Tiago L. Alves
{"title":"Assessment of product maintainability for two space domain simulators","authors":"Tiago L. Alves","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2010.5609752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The software life-cycle of applications supporting space missions follows a rigorous process in order to ensure the application compliance with all the specified requirements. Ensuring the correct behavior of the application is critical since an error can lead, ultimately, to the loss of a complete space mission. However, it is not only important to ensure the correct behavior of the application but also to achieve good product quality since the applications need to be maintained for several years. Then, the question arises, is a rigorous process enough to guarantee good product maintainability? In this paper we assess the software product maintainability of two simulators used to support space missions. The assessment is done using both a standardized analysis, using the SIG quality model for maintainability, and a customized copyright license analysis. The assessment results revealed several quality problems leading to three lessons. First, rigorous process requirements by themselves do not ensure product quality. Second, quality models can be used not only to pinpoint code problems but also to reveal team issues. Finally, tailored analyses, complementing quality models, are necessary for in-depth investigation of quality.","PeriodicalId":101801,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2010.5609752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The software life-cycle of applications supporting space missions follows a rigorous process in order to ensure the application compliance with all the specified requirements. Ensuring the correct behavior of the application is critical since an error can lead, ultimately, to the loss of a complete space mission. However, it is not only important to ensure the correct behavior of the application but also to achieve good product quality since the applications need to be maintained for several years. Then, the question arises, is a rigorous process enough to guarantee good product maintainability? In this paper we assess the software product maintainability of two simulators used to support space missions. The assessment is done using both a standardized analysis, using the SIG quality model for maintainability, and a customized copyright license analysis. The assessment results revealed several quality problems leading to three lessons. First, rigorous process requirements by themselves do not ensure product quality. Second, quality models can be used not only to pinpoint code problems but also to reveal team issues. Finally, tailored analyses, complementing quality models, are necessary for in-depth investigation of quality.
两个空间域模拟器的产品可维护性评估
支持空间任务的应用程序的软件生命周期遵循严格的程序,以确保应用程序符合所有规定的要求。确保应用程序的正确行为至关重要,因为一个错误最终可能导致整个太空任务的失败。然而,重要的是不仅要确保应用程序的正确行为,而且要实现良好的产品质量,因为应用程序需要维护数年。那么问题来了,严格的流程是否足以保证良好的产品可维护性?在本文中,我们评估了两个用于支持航天任务的模拟器的软件产品可维护性。评估是使用标准化分析(使用SIG质量模型进行可维护性)和定制的版权许可分析来完成的。评估结果显示了几个质量问题,导致了三个教训。第一,严格的工艺要求本身并不能保证产品质量。其次,质量模型不仅可以用来确定代码问题,还可以用来揭示团队问题。最后,有针对性的分析,补充质量模型,是深入研究质量的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信