Guidelines for Benchmarking Automated Software Traceability Techniques

Yonghee Shin, J. Hayes, J. Cleland-Huang
{"title":"Guidelines for Benchmarking Automated Software Traceability Techniques","authors":"Yonghee Shin, J. Hayes, J. Cleland-Huang","doi":"10.1109/SST.2015.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To comparatively evaluate automated trace ability solutions, we need to develop standardized benchmarks. However there is currently no consensus on how a benchmark should be constructed and used to evaluate competing techniques. In this paper we discuss recurring problems in evaluating trace ability techniques, identify essential properties that evaluation methods should possess, and provide guidelines for benchmarking software trace ability techniques. We illustrate the properties and guidelines using empirical evaluation of three software trace ability techniques on nine data sets.","PeriodicalId":404877,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Symposium on Software and Systems Traceability","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Symposium on Software and Systems Traceability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SST.2015.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

To comparatively evaluate automated trace ability solutions, we need to develop standardized benchmarks. However there is currently no consensus on how a benchmark should be constructed and used to evaluate competing techniques. In this paper we discuss recurring problems in evaluating trace ability techniques, identify essential properties that evaluation methods should possess, and provide guidelines for benchmarking software trace ability techniques. We illustrate the properties and guidelines using empirical evaluation of three software trace ability techniques on nine data sets.
自动化软件可追溯性技术基准测试指南
为了比较地评估自动化跟踪能力解决方案,我们需要开发标准化的基准。然而,目前对于如何构建和使用基准来评估竞争技术还没有达成共识。在本文中,我们讨论了评估跟踪能力技术中反复出现的问题,确定了评估方法应该拥有的基本属性,并为基准测试软件跟踪能力技术提供了指导方针。我们利用对九个数据集的三种软件跟踪能力技术的经验评估来说明属性和指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信