{"title":"Fundamentals of Investor-State Arbitration in Islamic Countries under the OIC Agreement for Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments","authors":"Faisal Daudpota","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3824003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investment treaties are meant for promotion and regulation of foreign investments in a country that aspires to secure investment from a foreign governments or foreign private persons. Such treaties provide the necessary legal framework to ensure protection of investments and remedies for concerned parties in case of non-compliance by the investment recipient country. <br><br>At least 25 member countries to Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) have also ratified a multilateral investment treaty, namely: The Agreement for Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments among the OIC Member States (APPGI-OIC Agreement).<br><br>This article provides an overview of the fundamentals to investor-state arbitration under APPGI-OIC Agreement. <br><br>For convenient reading the body of this article has been arranged into six parts as below. The first part serves as an introduction to the built-in arbitration clause of APPGI-OIC Agreement, and the institutional arrangements in the form of the OIC Arbitration Center that has been set up in Istanbul, Turkey; the second part highlights the meanings as to “Investor”, “Investment” “Capital” and “Dispute” as used in APPGI-OIC Agreement.<br><br>The third part analyzes actions or inaction of the Host State that can lead to an arbitration/damages claim from an Investor, and also focuses on the jurisprudence as to most favored nation (MFN) clause in relation to APPGI-OIC Agreement; the fourth part notes the nature of guarantee breaches that can also result in an arbitration/damages claim under APPGI-OIC Agreement; the fifth part discusses the Defenses Available to Host State against monetary damages claims; and the final part six which serves as the conclusion to this article, identifies various advantages for the Host State in exploring settlement negotiations instead of contesting an arbitration claim.","PeriodicalId":378416,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Law eJournal","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3824003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Investment treaties are meant for promotion and regulation of foreign investments in a country that aspires to secure investment from a foreign governments or foreign private persons. Such treaties provide the necessary legal framework to ensure protection of investments and remedies for concerned parties in case of non-compliance by the investment recipient country.
At least 25 member countries to Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) have also ratified a multilateral investment treaty, namely: The Agreement for Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments among the OIC Member States (APPGI-OIC Agreement).
This article provides an overview of the fundamentals to investor-state arbitration under APPGI-OIC Agreement.
For convenient reading the body of this article has been arranged into six parts as below. The first part serves as an introduction to the built-in arbitration clause of APPGI-OIC Agreement, and the institutional arrangements in the form of the OIC Arbitration Center that has been set up in Istanbul, Turkey; the second part highlights the meanings as to “Investor”, “Investment” “Capital” and “Dispute” as used in APPGI-OIC Agreement.
The third part analyzes actions or inaction of the Host State that can lead to an arbitration/damages claim from an Investor, and also focuses on the jurisprudence as to most favored nation (MFN) clause in relation to APPGI-OIC Agreement; the fourth part notes the nature of guarantee breaches that can also result in an arbitration/damages claim under APPGI-OIC Agreement; the fifth part discusses the Defenses Available to Host State against monetary damages claims; and the final part six which serves as the conclusion to this article, identifies various advantages for the Host State in exploring settlement negotiations instead of contesting an arbitration claim.