Analysis of the Hydraulic Jump Characteristics in a Stilling Basin to Avoid Dam Failure

E. Fatimah, A. Azmeri, Q. Aini, M Fauzi, M. Rizalihadi
{"title":"Analysis of the Hydraulic Jump Characteristics in a Stilling Basin to Avoid Dam Failure","authors":"E. Fatimah, A. Azmeri, Q. Aini, M Fauzi, M. Rizalihadi","doi":"10.24815/ijdm.v6i1.31990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flooding may occur due to dam failure at downstream of the spillway. Stilling basin of the spillway plays an important role in reducing turbulence generated by hydraulic jumps. It can avoid flooding and local scouring as well. Therefore, this study aims to analyze hydraulic jump characteristics experimentally. Two series of structures namely initial (S0) and final (S1) were tested. The S0 model is the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) III type, while S1 is set the adverse slope of 1:2 at the downstream and lowering the bottom elevation of the channel by 4 m. Measurements were taken on the length of hydraulic jumps, water level and high speed before-after hydraulic jumps at various return periods discharges (Q) of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 1000 years. It is found that at S1, the jump is submerged, causing the relative hydraulic jump height (y2-y1)/y1 to be 40-90% higher than S0. Furthermore, the compression of more than 50% of the hydraulic jump length ratio (Lj/y2) was indicated at S1. In addition, the energy dissipation efficiency (εt) obtained for each discharge at S1 ranged from 58-84% (good absorption). On the other hand, at S0, the εt produced was around 70-89% (Q2-Q50) and 45% (Q100 and Q1000). It can be concluded that the modification of USBR III can reduce the vulnerability of the bottom and downstream parts of the stilling basin. It is expected that the potential flood disaster due to the stilling basin failure of the dam can be eliminated. These results may be used as recommendation to the disaster management strategies, such as improving dam safety guidelines, informing emergency response plans, or guiding infrastructure design to withstand hydraulic forces.","PeriodicalId":153413,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Management","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/ijdm.v6i1.31990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flooding may occur due to dam failure at downstream of the spillway. Stilling basin of the spillway plays an important role in reducing turbulence generated by hydraulic jumps. It can avoid flooding and local scouring as well. Therefore, this study aims to analyze hydraulic jump characteristics experimentally. Two series of structures namely initial (S0) and final (S1) were tested. The S0 model is the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) III type, while S1 is set the adverse slope of 1:2 at the downstream and lowering the bottom elevation of the channel by 4 m. Measurements were taken on the length of hydraulic jumps, water level and high speed before-after hydraulic jumps at various return periods discharges (Q) of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 1000 years. It is found that at S1, the jump is submerged, causing the relative hydraulic jump height (y2-y1)/y1 to be 40-90% higher than S0. Furthermore, the compression of more than 50% of the hydraulic jump length ratio (Lj/y2) was indicated at S1. In addition, the energy dissipation efficiency (εt) obtained for each discharge at S1 ranged from 58-84% (good absorption). On the other hand, at S0, the εt produced was around 70-89% (Q2-Q50) and 45% (Q100 and Q1000). It can be concluded that the modification of USBR III can reduce the vulnerability of the bottom and downstream parts of the stilling basin. It is expected that the potential flood disaster due to the stilling basin failure of the dam can be eliminated. These results may be used as recommendation to the disaster management strategies, such as improving dam safety guidelines, informing emergency response plans, or guiding infrastructure design to withstand hydraulic forces.
防止溃坝的消力池水跃特性分析
溢洪道下游的溃坝可能引起洪水。泄洪道消力池对减小水力跳变产生的湍流具有重要作用。它也可以避免洪水和局部冲刷。因此,本研究旨在通过实验分析水跃特性。试验了初始(S0)和最终(S1)两个系列的结构。S0模型为美国垦务局(USBR) III型,S1在下游设置1:2的逆坡,将河道底高程降低4m。测量了2、5、10、25、50、100和1000年不同回潮期(Q)的水力跳跃长度、水位和高速前后的水力跳跃。研究发现,在S1处,跳水被淹没,导致相对水跃高度(y2-y1)/y1比S0高40-90%。此外,在S1处,压缩量大于50%的水力跳长比(Lj/y2)。S1处每次放电的能量耗散效率(εt)在58 ~ 84%之间(吸收良好)。另一方面,在50时,产生的εt约为70-89% (Q2-Q50)和45% (Q100和Q1000)。由此可见,对USBR III进行改造可以降低消力池底部及下游的脆弱性。预计可以消除因大坝消力池失效而产生的潜在洪涝灾害。这些结果可作为灾害管理策略的建议,如改进大坝安全准则,为应急响应计划提供信息,或指导基础设施设计以承受水力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信