Leader Election for Multi-channel Radio Networks - Dependent versus Independent Trials

Z. Golebiewski, Michal Koza, M. Klonowski, Mirosław Kutyłowski
{"title":"Leader Election for Multi-channel Radio Networks - Dependent versus Independent Trials","authors":"Z. Golebiewski, Michal Koza, M. Klonowski, Mirosław Kutyłowski","doi":"10.1109/ACIIDS.2009.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider access scheduling to a shared radio channel in networks where a set of stations tries to get exclusive rights to transmit over a shared radio channel. A frequent strategy to solve this problem is that each station independently tosses an asymmetric coin and transmits in case of tails. The trials are executed some number of times and the first station that sends alone in a trial gets the right to broadcast over the shared channel. We consider here a multi-channel case: during onetime slot a station may transmit on k different channels.In this case trials can be arranged in two slightly different ways. The first method is that in each trial a station decides whether to participate in it; if it is so, then the station decides independently for each channel whether to transmit on it. According to the second method a station makes one decision whether to send and if the decision is positive it chooses a single channel for transmission. The second method guarantees a limited energy cost for each station but,as we show, turns out to be inferior regarding success probability. We consider these algorithms for a realistic number of stations. We analyze subtle differences between both algorithms regarding success probability.","PeriodicalId":275776,"journal":{"name":"2009 First Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 First Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIIDS.2009.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We consider access scheduling to a shared radio channel in networks where a set of stations tries to get exclusive rights to transmit over a shared radio channel. A frequent strategy to solve this problem is that each station independently tosses an asymmetric coin and transmits in case of tails. The trials are executed some number of times and the first station that sends alone in a trial gets the right to broadcast over the shared channel. We consider here a multi-channel case: during onetime slot a station may transmit on k different channels.In this case trials can be arranged in two slightly different ways. The first method is that in each trial a station decides whether to participate in it; if it is so, then the station decides independently for each channel whether to transmit on it. According to the second method a station makes one decision whether to send and if the decision is positive it chooses a single channel for transmission. The second method guarantees a limited energy cost for each station but,as we show, turns out to be inferior regarding success probability. We consider these algorithms for a realistic number of stations. We analyze subtle differences between both algorithms regarding success probability.
多信道无线网络的领导人选举——依赖与独立试验
我们考虑在网络中对共享无线信道的访问调度,其中一组电台试图获得通过共享无线信道的独家传输权。解决这个问题的一个常用策略是,每个站点独立地投掷一枚非对称硬币,并在反面的情况下进行传输。试验执行若干次,并且在试验中单独发送的第一个站获得在共享频道上广播的权利。我们在这里考虑一个多信道的情况:在一个时隙中,一个电台可以在k个不同的信道上传输。在这种情况下,审判可以以两种略有不同的方式安排。第一种方法是在每次试验中由一个工作站决定是否参加试验;如果是这样,那么电台独立决定是否在每个频道上传输。根据第二种方法,站做出是否发送的决定,如果决定是肯定的,则选择单个信道进行传输。第二种方法保证每个站点的能源成本有限,但正如我们所示,其成功概率较低。我们将这些算法考虑为实际数量的站点。我们分析了两种算法在成功率方面的细微差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信