The Effect of Strong and Weak Unidimensional Item Pools on Computerized Adaptive Classification Testing

Ceylan Gündeğer, Sümeyra Soysal
{"title":"The Effect of Strong and Weak Unidimensional Item Pools on Computerized Adaptive Classification Testing","authors":"Ceylan Gündeğer, Sümeyra Soysal","doi":"10.51535/tell.1202804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computerized Adaptive Classification Tests (CACT) aim to classify individuals effectively with high classification accuracy and few items over large item pools. The characteristic features of the item pool include the number of items, item factor loadings, the distribution of the Test Information Function, and dimensionality. In this study, we present the results of a comprehensive simulation study that was examined how item selection methods (MFI-KLI), ability estimation methods (EAP-WLE) and classification methods (SPRT-CI) were affected by strong and weak unidimensional item pools. Findings of the study indicate that CI had always produced results with classification accuracy similar to SPRT but with a test length of almost half. Additionally, KLI and MFI item selection methods were not affected by the item pool characteristic as weak or strong unidimensionality. From findings of this study, it can be recommended to use CI with EAP in CACT studies, whether the item pool is weak or strong unidimensional, but WLE only under strong unidimensional item pools. Additionally, EAP and SPRT methods are recommended to prefer in the weak unidimensional item pool.","PeriodicalId":127236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1202804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computerized Adaptive Classification Tests (CACT) aim to classify individuals effectively with high classification accuracy and few items over large item pools. The characteristic features of the item pool include the number of items, item factor loadings, the distribution of the Test Information Function, and dimensionality. In this study, we present the results of a comprehensive simulation study that was examined how item selection methods (MFI-KLI), ability estimation methods (EAP-WLE) and classification methods (SPRT-CI) were affected by strong and weak unidimensional item pools. Findings of the study indicate that CI had always produced results with classification accuracy similar to SPRT but with a test length of almost half. Additionally, KLI and MFI item selection methods were not affected by the item pool characteristic as weak or strong unidimensionality. From findings of this study, it can be recommended to use CI with EAP in CACT studies, whether the item pool is weak or strong unidimensional, but WLE only under strong unidimensional item pools. Additionally, EAP and SPRT methods are recommended to prefer in the weak unidimensional item pool.
强、弱单维题库对计算机自适应分类测试的影响
计算机自适应分类测试(computer Adaptive Classification Tests, CACT)的目标是在大的题库中,以高的分类准确率和较少的题库对个体进行有效的分类。项目池的特征包括项目的数量、项目因子负载、测试信息功能的分布以及维度。在本研究中,我们提出了一项综合模拟研究的结果,研究了强和弱一维项目池对项目选择方法(MFI-KLI)、能力估计方法(EAP-WLE)和分类方法(SPRT-CI)的影响。研究结果表明,CI总是产生与SPRT相似的分类精度结果,但测试长度几乎是一半。此外,KLI和MFI项目选择方法不受项目池特征的弱或强单维性的影响。从本研究结果来看,CACT研究中,无论项目池是弱或强单维,都可以推荐使用CI与EAP,而WLE仅在强单维项目池下使用。在弱单维题库中,建议优先使用EAP和SPRT方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信