Similarity of Goods and Services

I. Fhima, D. Gangjee
{"title":"Similarity of Goods and Services","authors":"I. Fhima, D. Gangjee","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199674336.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An action lies for likelihood of confusion where the parties’ goods are either identical or similar. Generally, it is relatively straightforward to ascertain whether goods or services are identical, and even if it is not, there is always the fallback of arguing that the goods are similar. Therefore, this chapter concentrates on how similarity of goods can be demonstrated. Although the assessment of similarity of goods is arguably more straightforward than that for similarity of marks, it nevertheless involves an assessment and balancing of a number of factors which may suggest contradictory outcomes. Unlike similarity of marks, not every factor is considered in every case, and in many cases just a couple of the factors are considered, adding a degree of unpredictability to the test. A potential added complication is that, in line with the global appreciation approach to assessing likelihood of confusion, the degree of similarity of goods required in any one case should depend on the level of similarity of marks and the distinctiveness of the senior marks.","PeriodicalId":278652,"journal":{"name":"The Confusion Test in European Trade Mark Law","volume":"34 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Confusion Test in European Trade Mark Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199674336.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An action lies for likelihood of confusion where the parties’ goods are either identical or similar. Generally, it is relatively straightforward to ascertain whether goods or services are identical, and even if it is not, there is always the fallback of arguing that the goods are similar. Therefore, this chapter concentrates on how similarity of goods can be demonstrated. Although the assessment of similarity of goods is arguably more straightforward than that for similarity of marks, it nevertheless involves an assessment and balancing of a number of factors which may suggest contradictory outcomes. Unlike similarity of marks, not every factor is considered in every case, and in many cases just a couple of the factors are considered, adding a degree of unpredictability to the test. A potential added complication is that, in line with the global appreciation approach to assessing likelihood of confusion, the degree of similarity of goods required in any one case should depend on the level of similarity of marks and the distinctiveness of the senior marks.
商品和服务的相似性
当当事人的货物相同或相似时,诉讼是基于混淆的可能性。一般来说,确定商品或服务是否相同是相对简单的,即使不是,也总是有争论商品相似的退一步。因此,本章主要讨论如何证明商品的相似性。尽管对商品相似度的评估可以说比对商标相似度的评估更直接,但它仍然涉及到对一些可能产生矛盾结果的因素的评估和平衡。与相似度不同的是,并不是每个情况下都考虑到每个因素,在许多情况下,只考虑几个因素,这给测试增加了一定程度的不可预测性。另一个潜在的复杂情况是,根据评估混淆可能性的全球增值方法,在任何一种情况下所要求的商品相似程度应取决于商标的相似程度和高级商标的显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信