BOPS in Omnichannel Retailing with Return and Cross-selling

Simin Xu, Weimin Ma, H. He
{"title":"BOPS in Omnichannel Retailing with Return and Cross-selling","authors":"Simin Xu, Weimin Ma, H. He","doi":"10.2991/febm-19.2019.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many retailers have started to integrate online and store channels (such as BOPS) in order to enhance the consumer experience. This paper studies a decision problem of when it is preferable for a dual-channel retailer to introduce BOPS strategy. Based on the utility functions, we develop a model to investigate the interplay between the monopolist retailer and consumers. Our results show that the introduction of BOPS has two aspects of influence: intensifying channel competition and eliminating the effects of cross-selling. Besides, we find that BOPS is not always beneficial to the retailer. Especially for the store, when the impact of cross-selling is too large or too small, introducing BOPS actually damages the store's profit. Keywords—omnichannel retailing; BOPS;channel competition; cross-selling; return","PeriodicalId":417272,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2019)","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/febm-19.2019.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many retailers have started to integrate online and store channels (such as BOPS) in order to enhance the consumer experience. This paper studies a decision problem of when it is preferable for a dual-channel retailer to introduce BOPS strategy. Based on the utility functions, we develop a model to investigate the interplay between the monopolist retailer and consumers. Our results show that the introduction of BOPS has two aspects of influence: intensifying channel competition and eliminating the effects of cross-selling. Besides, we find that BOPS is not always beneficial to the retailer. Especially for the store, when the impact of cross-selling is too large or too small, introducing BOPS actually damages the store's profit. Keywords—omnichannel retailing; BOPS;channel competition; cross-selling; return
全渠道零售与退货和交叉销售的BOPS
许多零售商已经开始整合在线和商店渠道(如BOPS),以增强消费者体验。本文研究了双渠道零售商引入boops策略时的决策问题。基于效用函数,我们建立了一个模型来研究垄断零售商与消费者之间的相互作用。我们的研究结果表明,BOPS的引入有两个方面的影响:加剧渠道竞争和消除交叉销售的影响。此外,我们发现BOPS并不总是对零售商有利。特别是对于商店来说,当交叉销售的影响过大或过小时,引入BOPS实际上损害了商店的利润。Keywords-omnichannel零售;打架,渠道竞争;交叉销售;返回
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书