{"title":"EU marketing authorization subsequent to dissolution of the transferor and prior to effective transfer","authors":"Lucyne Ghazarian, C. Koenig","doi":"10.3233/PPL-130358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulation (EC) No 2141/96 holds no explicit provision about the validity of a EU centralised marketing authorisation for a medicinal product during the time gap between dissolution of the transferor after granting of a favourable opinion by the EMA and effective authorisation by the European Commission. Marketing authorisations for medicinal products in terms of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 are personal administrative acts, which, in principle, excludes a transfer unless otherwise and under exceptional terms allowed (enumeratio ergo limitatio). Regulation (EC) No 2141/96 constitutes such an exemption, laying down the procedural rules for a transfer of marketing authorisation. Though for this particular case the regulation holds no explicit provision about validity during the time gap. Despite the absence of a provision about validity the time gap has to be filled by teleological interpretation to ensure that amongst several possible interpretations the one will prevail which best guarantees the practical effect of existing Community law. The examination of the objectives of the Regulations (EC) No 726/2004 and No 2141/96 indicate the validity of the marketing authorisation and consequently the transferee’s authorisation during that period of time.","PeriodicalId":348240,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-130358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Regulation (EC) No 2141/96 holds no explicit provision about the validity of a EU centralised marketing authorisation for a medicinal product during the time gap between dissolution of the transferor after granting of a favourable opinion by the EMA and effective authorisation by the European Commission. Marketing authorisations for medicinal products in terms of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 are personal administrative acts, which, in principle, excludes a transfer unless otherwise and under exceptional terms allowed (enumeratio ergo limitatio). Regulation (EC) No 2141/96 constitutes such an exemption, laying down the procedural rules for a transfer of marketing authorisation. Though for this particular case the regulation holds no explicit provision about validity during the time gap. Despite the absence of a provision about validity the time gap has to be filled by teleological interpretation to ensure that amongst several possible interpretations the one will prevail which best guarantees the practical effect of existing Community law. The examination of the objectives of the Regulations (EC) No 726/2004 and No 2141/96 indicate the validity of the marketing authorisation and consequently the transferee’s authorisation during that period of time.
法规(EC) No 2141/96没有明确规定在EMA给予有利意见后解除转让方和欧盟委员会有效授权之间的时间间隔内,药品的欧盟集中上市许可的有效性。根据法规(EC) No 726/2004第3(1)条规定的药品上市许可是个人行政行为,原则上排除转让,除非另有规定并在例外条件下允许(列举因此限制)。法规(EC) No 2141/96构成了这种豁免,规定了上市许可转让的程序规则。虽然对于这种特殊情况,该条例没有明确规定在时间间隔期间的效力。尽管没有关于有效性的规定,但时间差距必须由目的论解释来填补,以确保在几种可能的解释中,最能保证现有共同体法律实际效果的解释将占上风。对法规(EC) No 726/2004和No 2141/96目标的审查表明了上市许可的有效性,从而表明了该期间内受让人的授权。