Improving Learning Outcomes through Systematic Group Reformation - The Role of Skills and Personality in Software Engineering Education

A. Mujkanovic, A. Bollin
{"title":"Improving Learning Outcomes through Systematic Group Reformation - The Role of Skills and Personality in Software Engineering Education","authors":"A. Mujkanovic, A. Bollin","doi":"10.1145/2897586.2897615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group or team formation has been a well-studied field in numerous contexts, such as business teams, project teams, and educational teams. There has, however, been little consideration of how groups or particularly project teams might have to be reorganized during a lecture in order to yield an optimal learning outcome. Empirical studies show that the outcome of groups will be affected by a number of factors, including the individual behavior of each group member, their skills and inclinations. In this research, the authors aim at finding correlations between the individual characteristics and learning outcomes during a running lecture so that teaching and learning can be improved. A study has been carried out that involved software engineering students over the past three years. The results show an improvement in the learning outcomes for groups that were systematically formed, which, for future settings, could enable educators as well as project leaders to systematically form groups and improve the outcomes of these groups in various domains.","PeriodicalId":318848,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586.2897615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Group or team formation has been a well-studied field in numerous contexts, such as business teams, project teams, and educational teams. There has, however, been little consideration of how groups or particularly project teams might have to be reorganized during a lecture in order to yield an optimal learning outcome. Empirical studies show that the outcome of groups will be affected by a number of factors, including the individual behavior of each group member, their skills and inclinations. In this research, the authors aim at finding correlations between the individual characteristics and learning outcomes during a running lecture so that teaching and learning can be improved. A study has been carried out that involved software engineering students over the past three years. The results show an improvement in the learning outcomes for groups that were systematically formed, which, for future settings, could enable educators as well as project leaders to systematically form groups and improve the outcomes of these groups in various domains.
通过系统的小组改革提高学习效果——技能和个性在软件工程教育中的作用
在许多上下文中,例如业务团队、项目团队和教育团队,团队或团队形成已经是一个得到充分研究的领域。然而,很少有人考虑如何在讲座期间重新组织小组或特别是项目团队,以产生最佳的学习结果。实证研究表明,群体的结果会受到许多因素的影响,包括每个群体成员的个人行为、他们的技能和倾向。在本研究中,作者旨在发现个体特征与学习成果之间的相关性,从而改善教学和学习。在过去的三年里,一项涉及软件工程专业学生的研究已经开展。研究结果表明,系统形成的小组的学习成果有所改善,对于未来的设置,这可以使教育工作者和项目负责人系统地形成小组,并改善这些小组在各个领域的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信