{"title":"Navigating the next Industrial revolution: Future Work Force analysis based on Western Australian narrative","authors":"Pasan Ganegama","doi":"10.31098/ijmesh.v2i2.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study adopts a Focus group discussion than the more dominant quantitative data in studying Western Australian Business landscape and it’s local and global disrupters, repellents and extractors are exhaustively and critically analyzed. In order to ascertain needed competencies to navigate the next industrial revolution, current practices of government and non-government initiatives can be Juxtaposed to rowing and rafting phenomena. The current global strategic HR perspective should be focused, fast and flexible but the Australian Government and most corporate conglomerates view are it should be Safe, Slow and Strict. People make sense of their world where human actions are based upon the person's interpretation of events, societal meanings, intentions and beliefs (Gill and Johnson 20101; Denzin and Lincoln, 20052). The Australian public’s belief in navigating the next industrial revolution and the effect of Government policy-making is analyzed critically in this paper. The following two questions being answered with practical disparity and in the end, adjusted accordingly to make sense to the layman terms. First “Why we need to reimagine Human Resource Management perspective?” was unveiled. Secondly, the key features of future Human Resource Management were questioned. Thirdly what should the Australian corporates and Governments do differently to assimilate our workforce to reap benefits from the next industrial revolution is discussed. Finally championing the change using the right blend of leadership style and scale of change discussed in length to add clarity to the perspective.","PeriodicalId":403893,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v2i2.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study adopts a Focus group discussion than the more dominant quantitative data in studying Western Australian Business landscape and it’s local and global disrupters, repellents and extractors are exhaustively and critically analyzed. In order to ascertain needed competencies to navigate the next industrial revolution, current practices of government and non-government initiatives can be Juxtaposed to rowing and rafting phenomena. The current global strategic HR perspective should be focused, fast and flexible but the Australian Government and most corporate conglomerates view are it should be Safe, Slow and Strict. People make sense of their world where human actions are based upon the person's interpretation of events, societal meanings, intentions and beliefs (Gill and Johnson 20101; Denzin and Lincoln, 20052). The Australian public’s belief in navigating the next industrial revolution and the effect of Government policy-making is analyzed critically in this paper. The following two questions being answered with practical disparity and in the end, adjusted accordingly to make sense to the layman terms. First “Why we need to reimagine Human Resource Management perspective?” was unveiled. Secondly, the key features of future Human Resource Management were questioned. Thirdly what should the Australian corporates and Governments do differently to assimilate our workforce to reap benefits from the next industrial revolution is discussed. Finally championing the change using the right blend of leadership style and scale of change discussed in length to add clarity to the perspective.
该研究采用焦点小组讨论,而不是研究西澳大利亚商业格局的更主要的定量数据,并对当地和全球的干扰因素,排斥因素和提取因素进行了详尽和批判性的分析。为了确定驾驭下一次工业革命所需的能力,目前政府和非政府倡议的做法可以与划船和漂流现象并列。当前的全球战略人力资源视角应该是专注的、快速的和灵活的,但澳大利亚政府和大多数企业集团的观点是,它应该是安全的、缓慢的和严格的。人们理解他们的世界,在这个世界中,人类的行为是基于人们对事件、社会意义、意图和信仰的解释(Gill and Johnson 20101;登津和林肯,20052)。澳大利亚公众在导航下一次工业革命和政府政策制定的影响的信念是批判性地分析在这篇论文。以下两个问题的答案在实际中存在差异,最后,根据外行术语进行相应调整。首先“为什么我们需要重新构想人力资源管理的视角?”被揭开了面纱。其次,对未来人力资源管理的关键特征进行了探讨。第三,讨论了澳大利亚公司和政府应该采取哪些不同的措施来吸收我们的劳动力,以便从下一次工业革命中获益。最后,使用正确的领导风格和变革规模的混合来支持变革,以增加视角的清晰度。