Does Firms’ Equity Financing Benefit Debtholders? Evidence from Private Placements of Equity

Jun-Koo Kang, Jee Youn Koh, James L. Park
{"title":"Does Firms’ Equity Financing Benefit Debtholders? Evidence from Private Placements of Equity","authors":"Jun-Koo Kang, Jee Youn Koh, James L. Park","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3846717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine how private placements of equity (PPEs) affect debtholder wealth. We find that banks charge higher loan spreads, require more collateral, and impose stricter covenants for firms conducting PPEs. The results are more pronounced for firms without a value-enhancing PPE feature, particularly those with poorer governance and higher information asymmetry. These firms also invest less efficiently and underperform in the post-placement period and realize more negative bond and stock returns around PPE (post-placement M&A) announcement dates. Thus, issuers’ managerial entrenchment problems are the main source of debtholders’ loss in PPEs, and lenders use such information in adjusting lending terms.","PeriodicalId":264671,"journal":{"name":"Nanyang Business School Research Paper Series","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanyang Business School Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3846717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine how private placements of equity (PPEs) affect debtholder wealth. We find that banks charge higher loan spreads, require more collateral, and impose stricter covenants for firms conducting PPEs. The results are more pronounced for firms without a value-enhancing PPE feature, particularly those with poorer governance and higher information asymmetry. These firms also invest less efficiently and underperform in the post-placement period and realize more negative bond and stock returns around PPE (post-placement M&A) announcement dates. Thus, issuers’ managerial entrenchment problems are the main source of debtholders’ loss in PPEs, and lenders use such information in adjusting lending terms.
企业股权融资是否有利于债权人?来自私募股权的证据
我们研究私募股权(ppe)如何影响债权人的财富。我们发现,银行收取更高的贷款利差,要求更多的抵押品,并对开展私人股本的公司施加更严格的契约。对于没有价值提升的个人防护能力特征的公司,特别是那些治理较差和信息不对称程度较高的公司,结果更为明显。这些公司在配售后的投资效率也较低,表现不佳,在PPE(配售后的M&A)公告日期前后实现更多的负债券和股票回报。因此,发行人的管理壕沟问题是股东在私人股本方面损失的主要来源,而贷款机构则利用这些信息来调整贷款条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信