Effectiveness of Chia Seed Plant Powder in Comparison with Malathion in the Control of Bean Weevils

Francis Kamugisha, Fina Opio, David Osiru, Kenneth Faith Aharinta
{"title":"Effectiveness of Chia Seed Plant Powder in Comparison with Malathion in the Control of Bean Weevils","authors":"Francis Kamugisha, Fina Opio, David Osiru, Kenneth Faith Aharinta","doi":"10.37284/eajab.6.1.1261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of the research was to contribute to the control of storage pests in beans through the use of chia seed plant powder—an organic control method. The study adopted both descriptive and correlational research designs for data collection and analysis. It comprised: a survey of the chia farmers in Kyabugimbi sub-county, Uganda, for the purpose of assessing their perception concerning control of storage pests in beans through the use of chia seed plant powder; and an experiment for assessing the susceptibility of a variety of beans and pesticide application. The experiment had three bean varieties: NAROBEAN3, NABE16, and KAHURA. The type of pesticide had two treatments and control, that is, chia seed plant powder and malathion, and each had three levels. A control consisted of dishes with bean varieties infested with weevils without any pesticide added. Each set was comprised of control without any treatment. A total of 54 samples were used. These were laid out in a completely randomised design (CRD) and replicated three times. Pesticides were applied at 0%, 50%, and 100% rates of application. Data were collected on the following measurements: Number of infested seeds, number of adult bruchids that emerged, and weight of seeds at the end of the experiment. The ANOVA test results found that the effect of pesticide application on the number of infested seeds, number of weevils that emerged, and weight of bean seeds was significant (P< 0.01), while the variety of beans was not significant. Although malathion had the lowest bean weevil figures and is therefore more effective in controlling bean weevils, it is a synthetic product, and chia seed would be promoted because it is an organic product because of being more friendly to the human body and the environment than malathion, a synthetic pesticide","PeriodicalId":144021,"journal":{"name":"East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37284/eajab.6.1.1261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of the research was to contribute to the control of storage pests in beans through the use of chia seed plant powder—an organic control method. The study adopted both descriptive and correlational research designs for data collection and analysis. It comprised: a survey of the chia farmers in Kyabugimbi sub-county, Uganda, for the purpose of assessing their perception concerning control of storage pests in beans through the use of chia seed plant powder; and an experiment for assessing the susceptibility of a variety of beans and pesticide application. The experiment had three bean varieties: NAROBEAN3, NABE16, and KAHURA. The type of pesticide had two treatments and control, that is, chia seed plant powder and malathion, and each had three levels. A control consisted of dishes with bean varieties infested with weevils without any pesticide added. Each set was comprised of control without any treatment. A total of 54 samples were used. These were laid out in a completely randomised design (CRD) and replicated three times. Pesticides were applied at 0%, 50%, and 100% rates of application. Data were collected on the following measurements: Number of infested seeds, number of adult bruchids that emerged, and weight of seeds at the end of the experiment. The ANOVA test results found that the effect of pesticide application on the number of infested seeds, number of weevils that emerged, and weight of bean seeds was significant (P< 0.01), while the variety of beans was not significant. Although malathion had the lowest bean weevil figures and is therefore more effective in controlling bean weevils, it is a synthetic product, and chia seed would be promoted because it is an organic product because of being more friendly to the human body and the environment than malathion, a synthetic pesticide
奇亚籽植物粉与马拉硫磷防治豆象虫的效果比较
本研究的主要目的是通过使用奇亚籽植物粉这一有机防治方法来防治大豆贮藏害虫。本研究采用描述性和相关性研究设计进行数据收集和分析。它包括:对乌干达Kyabugimbi副县的奇亚农民进行调查,目的是评估他们对通过使用奇亚籽植物粉控制豆类储存害虫的看法;并对不同品种大豆的易感性和农药施用进行了试验研究。试验选用了NAROBEAN3、NABE16和KAHURA三个品种的大豆。农药类型分为奇亚籽植物粉和马拉硫磷两种处理和控制,每一种有三个水平。对照是在没有添加任何杀虫剂的情况下,用感染象鼻虫的豆类品种做盘子。每组均由未做任何处理的对照组组成。总共使用了54个样本。这些实验采用完全随机设计(CRD),并重复了三次。农药施用量分别为0%、50%和100%。收集了以下数据:实验结束时,侵染种子的数量、出现的成虫数量和种子的重量。方差分析结果发现,施用农药对侵染种子数、出象甲数和豆粒重的影响极显著(P< 0.01),而对豆粒品种的影响不显著。虽然马拉硫磷的豆象虫数量最低,因此对豆象虫的控制效果更好,但它是一种合成产品,而奇亚籽是一种有机产品,比合成农药马拉硫磷对人体和环境更友好,因此会得到推广
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信