A Comparative Clinical Study on the Effects of Mehjama Nariya and Hijamat Bila Shart in Irqunnasa (Sciatica)

Mohammed Sheeraz, Mohd. Aleemuddin Quamari, Zaheer Ahmed
{"title":"A Comparative Clinical Study on the Effects of Mehjama Nariya and Hijamat Bila Shart in Irqunnasa (Sciatica)","authors":"Mohammed Sheeraz, Mohd. Aleemuddin Quamari, Zaheer Ahmed","doi":"10.5455/SPATULA.20131127023056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Irqunnasa (Sciatica) is one of the commonest neuralgic pains in lower limbs. The overall incidence of this condition is approximately between 13% and 40 % with the malady has the potential to become chronic and intractable with major socioeconomic implications. Several Unani medical regimens are claimed to be effective in its treatment, but are not corroborated. In order to validate scientifically, two different regimens viz; Mehjama Nariya (Fire cupping) and Hijamat Bila Shurt (Dry cupping) were selected to evaluate their effects comparatively in Irqunnasa by an open label, prospective, simple randomized, observational study. \nMethods: Diagnosed cases of Irqunnasa aged between 18 to 65 years of either gender fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected and randomly allocated after obtaining voluntary informed consent into two groups of 20 patients each viz; Group A Mehjama Nariya and Group B Hijamat Bila Shurt. Treatment protocol was followed for 15 days in both groups. \nResults: Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) scores before treatment in Group A was 10 and Group B was 9.4, while after treatment it declined to 6 in Group A and 6.6 in Group B. This reduction was found statistically significant in both groups (p< 0.01). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores in both groups revealed significant difference (p","PeriodicalId":309051,"journal":{"name":"Spatula DD - Peer Reviewed Journal on Complementary Medicine and Drug Discovery","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatula DD - Peer Reviewed Journal on Complementary Medicine and Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/SPATULA.20131127023056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim: Irqunnasa (Sciatica) is one of the commonest neuralgic pains in lower limbs. The overall incidence of this condition is approximately between 13% and 40 % with the malady has the potential to become chronic and intractable with major socioeconomic implications. Several Unani medical regimens are claimed to be effective in its treatment, but are not corroborated. In order to validate scientifically, two different regimens viz; Mehjama Nariya (Fire cupping) and Hijamat Bila Shurt (Dry cupping) were selected to evaluate their effects comparatively in Irqunnasa by an open label, prospective, simple randomized, observational study. Methods: Diagnosed cases of Irqunnasa aged between 18 to 65 years of either gender fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected and randomly allocated after obtaining voluntary informed consent into two groups of 20 patients each viz; Group A Mehjama Nariya and Group B Hijamat Bila Shurt. Treatment protocol was followed for 15 days in both groups. Results: Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) scores before treatment in Group A was 10 and Group B was 9.4, while after treatment it declined to 6 in Group A and 6.6 in Group B. This reduction was found statistically significant in both groups (p< 0.01). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores in both groups revealed significant difference (p
Mehjama Nariya与Hijamat Bila Shart治疗坐骨神经痛的临床比较研究
目的:坐骨神经痛是下肢最常见的神经性疼痛之一。该病的总发病率约为13%至40%,该病有可能成为慢性和难治性疾病,并具有重大的社会经济影响。据称有几种乌尼医疗方案对其治疗有效,但没有得到证实。为了科学地验证,两种不同的方案是;选取Mehjama Nariya(火罐)和Hijamat Bila Shurt(干罐),通过一项开放标签、前瞻性、简单随机、观察性研究,比较评价它们在伊拉克的效果。方法:选取年龄在18 ~ 65岁,符合入选标准的确诊伊尔昆那斯病患者,经自愿知情同意后随机分为两组,每组20例;A组Mehjama Nariya, B组Hijamat Bila Shurt。两组均按治疗方案治疗15 d。结果:A组治疗前VAS平均评分为10分,B组为9.4分,治疗后分别降至6分和6.6分,两组差异有统计学意义(p< 0.01)。两组的Oswestry失能指数(ODI)得分差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书