“Joy” and “Fear” in Thomas Bernhard’s autobiographies: Aspects of a Computational Sentiment Analysis

M. Sellner
{"title":"“Joy” and “Fear” in Thomas Bernhard’s autobiographies: Aspects of a Computational Sentiment Analysis","authors":"M. Sellner","doi":"10.1553/SENTIMENT_ANALYSISS1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This pilot-study of a computational analysis of literary texts presents the results of aspects of a “sentiment analysis”. The data of analysis are the autobiographies of the Austrian novelist Thomas Bernhard. The primary object of attention are the sentiments “joy” and “fear”. We elaborate on and demonstrate the impact of several preprocessing procedures, describe the characteristics of the dictionary and the annotations of its entries conceived and used for analysis. We specify the general methodology and the steps involved for quantifying of its result by the use of the functions of the R-package “Quanteda”. The descriptive output of the procedures is examined with several statistical measures to compare the counts of “joy” vs “fear” that were found in the texts individually, contrastively and in combination as a corpus. We conclude that there is a proportional and relative difference between the frequencies of the sentiments of the individual texts, but that this observation is insignificant if interpreted on the basis of the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A “goodness of fit” test, on the other hand, shows that the two sentiments show a homogeneous distribution across the corpus","PeriodicalId":210552,"journal":{"name":"Digital Lexis and Beyond","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Lexis and Beyond","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/SENTIMENT_ANALYSISS1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot-study of a computational analysis of literary texts presents the results of aspects of a “sentiment analysis”. The data of analysis are the autobiographies of the Austrian novelist Thomas Bernhard. The primary object of attention are the sentiments “joy” and “fear”. We elaborate on and demonstrate the impact of several preprocessing procedures, describe the characteristics of the dictionary and the annotations of its entries conceived and used for analysis. We specify the general methodology and the steps involved for quantifying of its result by the use of the functions of the R-package “Quanteda”. The descriptive output of the procedures is examined with several statistical measures to compare the counts of “joy” vs “fear” that were found in the texts individually, contrastively and in combination as a corpus. We conclude that there is a proportional and relative difference between the frequencies of the sentiments of the individual texts, but that this observation is insignificant if interpreted on the basis of the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A “goodness of fit” test, on the other hand, shows that the two sentiments show a homogeneous distribution across the corpus
托马斯·伯恩哈德自传中的“喜悦”和“恐惧”:计算情感分析的各个方面
这个文学文本计算分析的试点研究展示了“情感分析”的各个方面的结果。分析的数据来源于奥地利小说家托马斯·伯恩哈德的自传。注意的主要对象是情绪“喜悦”和“恐惧”。我们详细阐述并演示了几个预处理过程的影响,描述了词典的特征以及用于分析的词条的注释。我们指定了一般的方法和步骤,通过使用r包“Quanteda”的函数来量化其结果。程序的描述性输出通过几种统计措施进行检查,以比较单独、对比和组合为语料库的文本中发现的“喜悦”与“恐惧”的计数。我们得出结论,个别文本的情感频率之间存在比例和相对差异,但如果在非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验的基础上解释这种观察结果是微不足道的。另一方面,“拟合优度”检验表明,这两种情绪在整个语料库中呈现均匀分布
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信