Modeling Task Capability in Full Velocity Differential Model

Wajiha Batool, Mian Muhammad Mubasher, Syed Waqar ul Qounian
{"title":"Modeling Task Capability in Full Velocity Differential Model","authors":"Wajiha Batool, Mian Muhammad Mubasher, Syed Waqar ul Qounian","doi":"10.23919/ICACS.2019.8689141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Car following (CF) models formally explain acceleration behavior of drivers. Historically, human factors are not considered in CF models. Attention is a very critical human factor. Drug use, panic, fear, or anger may negatively affect attention and consequently driving behavior. In the recent years, researchers have focused on modeling of CF behavior considering human factors as an outcome of research by traffic psychologists and engineers. These observations make clear that integration of human factors into car following models is necessary to develop a more realistic depiction of CF maneuvers under intricate driving situations. In complex driving situations, it is important to measure the dynamic interaction of driving task demand and ability of driver to handle the task at hand. The basic idea of Task Capability Interface (TCI) model is to incorporate task difficulty and task demand within a framework which gives the detailed account of their influence on one another. Task demand and capability plays a key role in decision making. TCI model has earlier been used to improve two traditional CF models namely Gipps’ model and Intelligent Driver Model (IDM). The enhanced models are referred as TD-Gipps model and TD-IDM. There is another model namely Full Velocity Differential Model (FVDM). Unlike its predecessors, FVDM doesn’t suffer from unrealistic acceleration and deacceleration. But FVDM has not been enhanced using TCI model. In this work, FVDM has been enhanced to incorporate TCI model. The enhanced model namely TD-FVDM has been verified by comparing it with TD-Gipps using simulation-based experiments. The enhanced proposed model reproduces acceleration behavior as intended.","PeriodicalId":290819,"journal":{"name":"2019 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACS.2019.8689141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Car following (CF) models formally explain acceleration behavior of drivers. Historically, human factors are not considered in CF models. Attention is a very critical human factor. Drug use, panic, fear, or anger may negatively affect attention and consequently driving behavior. In the recent years, researchers have focused on modeling of CF behavior considering human factors as an outcome of research by traffic psychologists and engineers. These observations make clear that integration of human factors into car following models is necessary to develop a more realistic depiction of CF maneuvers under intricate driving situations. In complex driving situations, it is important to measure the dynamic interaction of driving task demand and ability of driver to handle the task at hand. The basic idea of Task Capability Interface (TCI) model is to incorporate task difficulty and task demand within a framework which gives the detailed account of their influence on one another. Task demand and capability plays a key role in decision making. TCI model has earlier been used to improve two traditional CF models namely Gipps’ model and Intelligent Driver Model (IDM). The enhanced models are referred as TD-Gipps model and TD-IDM. There is another model namely Full Velocity Differential Model (FVDM). Unlike its predecessors, FVDM doesn’t suffer from unrealistic acceleration and deacceleration. But FVDM has not been enhanced using TCI model. In this work, FVDM has been enhanced to incorporate TCI model. The enhanced model namely TD-FVDM has been verified by comparing it with TD-Gipps using simulation-based experiments. The enhanced proposed model reproduces acceleration behavior as intended.
全速差分模型中的任务能力建模
汽车跟随(CF)模型正式解释了驾驶员的加速行为。历史上,CF模型中没有考虑人为因素。注意力是一个非常关键的人为因素。吸毒、恐慌、恐惧或愤怒可能会对注意力产生负面影响,从而导致驾驶行为。近年来,研究人员将交通心理学家和工程师的研究成果集中在考虑人为因素的CF行为建模上。这些观察结果清楚地表明,将人为因素整合到汽车跟随模型中是必要的,以便在复杂的驾驶情况下开发更真实的CF操作描述。在复杂的驾驶情况下,衡量驾驶任务需求与驾驶员处理手头任务能力之间的动态交互作用是非常重要的。任务能力接口(Task Capability Interface, TCI)模型的基本思想是将任务难度和任务需求结合在一个框架内,并详细说明它们之间的相互影响。任务需求和能力在决策中起着关键作用。TCI模型早先被用来改进两种传统的CF模型,即Gipps模型和智能驾驶员模型(Intelligent Driver model, IDM)。增强的模型称为TD-Gipps模型和TD-IDM模型。还有一种模型,即全速差分模型(Full Velocity Differential model, FVDM)。不像它的前辈,FVDM不会遭受不切实际的加速和减速。但TCI模型并未对FVDM进行增强。本研究对FVDM进行了改进,加入了TCI模型。通过与TD-Gipps进行仿真实验,验证了改进后的TD-FVDM模型。增强的提议模型再现了预期的加速行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信