Distributable profit in nineteenth-century British regulated industries

Richard Morris
{"title":"Distributable profit in nineteenth-century British regulated industries","authors":"Richard Morris","doi":"10.1080/09585209300000044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a recent paper, Parker (1990) proposed that corporate financial reporting and auditing regulation in major nineteenth-century British industries was associated with concerns about monopoly powers, privileges granted by the State and financial and physical safety. This paper examines whether these factors can explain variation in the use of distributable profit for regulating dividends in special legislation and private acts of Parliament in four of the nineteenth-century industries covered by Parker, namely banking, railways, gas and insurance. It is argued that the use of dividend restrictions based on distributable profit was associated with concerns about monopoly power in these industries, but was not associated with issues of privilege or safety. Other explanations, including agency theory, are considered and rejected.","PeriodicalId":252763,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Business and Financial History","volume":"77 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Business and Financial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585209300000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

In a recent paper, Parker (1990) proposed that corporate financial reporting and auditing regulation in major nineteenth-century British industries was associated with concerns about monopoly powers, privileges granted by the State and financial and physical safety. This paper examines whether these factors can explain variation in the use of distributable profit for regulating dividends in special legislation and private acts of Parliament in four of the nineteenth-century industries covered by Parker, namely banking, railways, gas and insurance. It is argued that the use of dividend restrictions based on distributable profit was associated with concerns about monopoly power in these industries, but was not associated with issues of privilege or safety. Other explanations, including agency theory, are considered and rejected.
19世纪英国监管行业的可分配利润
在最近的一篇论文中,Parker(1990)提出,19世纪英国主要行业的公司财务报告和审计法规与对垄断权力、国家授予的特权以及财务和人身安全的担忧有关。本文考察了这些因素是否可以解释帕克所涵盖的四个19世纪行业中,即银行、铁路、天然气和保险,在特殊立法和议会私人法案中使用可分配利润来调节股息的变化。有人认为,基于可分配利润的股息限制的使用与对这些行业垄断权力的担忧有关,但与特权或安全问题无关。其他解释,包括代理理论,被考虑和拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信