Seeds of Ambivalence Sown: Barth’s Use of Calvin in Der Römerbrief II (1922)

SungWook Chung
{"title":"Seeds of Ambivalence Sown: Barth’s Use of Calvin in Der Römerbrief II (1922)","authors":"SungWook Chung","doi":"10.1163/27725472-07301005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Karl Barth’s theological relationship with John Calvin has been ignored by scholars for too long without any legitimate reason. Since Barth repeatedly affirmed his strong indebtedness to Calvin’s theology, it is essential to explicate his relationship to him in order to understand correctly the character of his theology. Der Römerbrief II (1922), which was written to replace Der Römerbrief I (1919), shows that Barth made a very careful use of Calvin’s exegetical and theological arguments in constructing his own exegetical positions. Even though Barth appreciates positively Calvin's theological insight in many aspects, he is not totally approving in his reappropriation of Calvin’s wisdom. in particular, one can find the incipient seeds of Barth’s ambivalence toward and revolt against Calvin in the former’s serious reservations about the latter’s doctrine of predestination. Thus it is arguable that in spite of Barth’s appreciative endorsement of what he sees as Calvin’s valid insights and arguments, the seeds of Barth’s serious challenge against his life-time mentor, Calvin, were already sown in Der Römerbrief II.","PeriodicalId":134774,"journal":{"name":"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-07301005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Karl Barth’s theological relationship with John Calvin has been ignored by scholars for too long without any legitimate reason. Since Barth repeatedly affirmed his strong indebtedness to Calvin’s theology, it is essential to explicate his relationship to him in order to understand correctly the character of his theology. Der Römerbrief II (1922), which was written to replace Der Römerbrief I (1919), shows that Barth made a very careful use of Calvin’s exegetical and theological arguments in constructing his own exegetical positions. Even though Barth appreciates positively Calvin's theological insight in many aspects, he is not totally approving in his reappropriation of Calvin’s wisdom. in particular, one can find the incipient seeds of Barth’s ambivalence toward and revolt against Calvin in the former’s serious reservations about the latter’s doctrine of predestination. Thus it is arguable that in spite of Barth’s appreciative endorsement of what he sees as Calvin’s valid insights and arguments, the seeds of Barth’s serious challenge against his life-time mentor, Calvin, were already sown in Der Römerbrief II.
矛盾的种子播种:巴斯对加尔文的使用在Der Römerbrief II (1922)
卡尔·巴特与约翰·加尔文的神学关系长期以来一直被学者们忽视,没有任何合理的理由。由于巴特反复肯定他对加尔文神学的强烈负债,为了正确理解他的神学的特征,有必要解释他与加尔文的关系。Der Römerbrief II(1922),这是为了取代Der Römerbrief I(1919)而写的,表明巴特在构建自己的训诂立场时非常谨慎地使用了加尔文的训诂和神学论点。尽管巴特肯定地欣赏加尔文在许多方面的神学见解,但他并不完全赞同加尔文对其智慧的重新挪用。特别是,人们可以在前者对后者的预定论的严重保留中找到巴特对加尔文的矛盾心理和反抗的萌芽。因此,有争议的是,尽管巴特对加尔文的有效见解和论点表示赞赏,但巴特对他一生的导师加尔文的严重挑战的种子已经在《Römerbrief II》中播下了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信