Static and Dynamic Pricing of Excess Capacity in a Make-to-Order Environment

Joseph M. Hall, P. Kopalle, David F. Pyke
{"title":"Static and Dynamic Pricing of Excess Capacity in a Make-to-Order Environment","authors":"Joseph M. Hall, P. Kopalle, David F. Pyke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.485702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen advances in research and management practice in the area of pricing, and particularly in dynamic pricing and revenue management. At the same time, researchers and managers have made dramatic improvements in production and supply chain management. The interactions between pricing and production/supply chain performance, however, are not as well understood. Can a firm benefit from knowing the status of the supply chain or production facility when making pricing decisions? How much can be gained if pricing decisions explicitly and optimally account for this status? This paper addresses these questions by examining a make-to-order manufacturer that serves two customer classes - core customers who pay a fixed negotiated price and are guaranteed job acceptance, and \"fill-in\" customers who make job submittal decisions based on the instantaneous price set by the firm for such orders. We examine four pricing policies that span a range of complexity and required knowledge about the status of the production system at the manufacturer, including the optimal policy of setting a different price for each possible state of the queue. We demonstrate properties of the optimal policy, and we illustrate numerically the financial gains a firm can achieve by following this policy vs. simpler pricing policies. The four policies we consider are (1) state-independent (static) pricing, (2) allowing fill-in orders only when the system is idle, (3) setting a uniform price up to a cut-off state, and (4) general state-dependent pricing. Although general state-dependent pricing is optimal in this setting, we find that charging a uniform price up to a cut-off state performs quite well in many settings and presents an attractive trade-off between ease of implementation and profitability. Thus, a fairly simple heuristic policy may actually out-perform the optimal policy when costs of design and implementation are taken into account.","PeriodicalId":172039,"journal":{"name":"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.485702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Recent years have seen advances in research and management practice in the area of pricing, and particularly in dynamic pricing and revenue management. At the same time, researchers and managers have made dramatic improvements in production and supply chain management. The interactions between pricing and production/supply chain performance, however, are not as well understood. Can a firm benefit from knowing the status of the supply chain or production facility when making pricing decisions? How much can be gained if pricing decisions explicitly and optimally account for this status? This paper addresses these questions by examining a make-to-order manufacturer that serves two customer classes - core customers who pay a fixed negotiated price and are guaranteed job acceptance, and "fill-in" customers who make job submittal decisions based on the instantaneous price set by the firm for such orders. We examine four pricing policies that span a range of complexity and required knowledge about the status of the production system at the manufacturer, including the optimal policy of setting a different price for each possible state of the queue. We demonstrate properties of the optimal policy, and we illustrate numerically the financial gains a firm can achieve by following this policy vs. simpler pricing policies. The four policies we consider are (1) state-independent (static) pricing, (2) allowing fill-in orders only when the system is idle, (3) setting a uniform price up to a cut-off state, and (4) general state-dependent pricing. Although general state-dependent pricing is optimal in this setting, we find that charging a uniform price up to a cut-off state performs quite well in many settings and presents an attractive trade-off between ease of implementation and profitability. Thus, a fairly simple heuristic policy may actually out-perform the optimal policy when costs of design and implementation are taken into account.
订单环境下过剩产能的静态和动态定价
近年来,定价领域的研究和管理实践取得了进展,特别是在动态定价和收入管理方面。与此同时,研究人员和管理人员在生产和供应链管理方面取得了巨大的进步。然而,定价与生产/供应链绩效之间的相互作用尚未得到很好的理解。在定价决策时,企业是否能从了解供应链或生产设施的状态中获益?如果定价决策明确且最优地考虑到这一状况,可以获得多少收益?本文通过考察一个按订单生产的制造商来解决这些问题,该制造商服务于两类客户——支付固定谈判价格并保证工作接受的核心客户,以及根据公司为此类订单设定的瞬时价格做出工作提交决策的“填充”客户。我们研究了四种定价策略,它们跨越了一定的复杂性,并且需要制造商对生产系统状态的了解,包括为队列的每种可能状态设置不同价格的最优策略。我们论证了最优策略的性质,并用数字说明了公司通过遵循该策略与更简单的定价策略可以获得的财务收益。我们考虑的四种策略是:(1)状态独立(静态)定价,(2)仅在系统空闲时允许填充订单,(3)设置直至截止状态的统一价格,以及(4)一般状态相关定价。尽管在这种情况下,一般的状态相关定价是最优的,但我们发现,在许多情况下,直到截止状态为止收取统一价格表现相当好,并且在易于实施和盈利能力之间呈现出一种有吸引力的权衡。因此,当考虑到设计和实现的成本时,一个相当简单的启发式策略实际上可能优于最优策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信