Implementation of Legal Presumption Principle for Notary Deed Makes Partij According to Law No. 2 of 2014 on the Amendment of Act No. 30 of 2004 Concerning Notary Position

Jurnal Akta Pub Date : 2020-02-11 DOI:10.30659/AKTA.6.4.771
Najmi Amudy, G. Gunarto, Achmad Sulchan
{"title":"Implementation of Legal Presumption Principle for Notary Deed Makes Partij According to Law No. 2 of 2014 on the Amendment of Act No. 30 of 2004 Concerning Notary Position","authors":"Najmi Amudy, G. Gunarto, Achmad Sulchan","doi":"10.30659/AKTA.6.4.771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to: 1) To identify and analyze the implementation of the principle of presumption valid for notaries who make Partij deed according to Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to the law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. 2) To identify and analyze problems and solutions for the implementation of a legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary according to Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to the law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by normative.Based on the results of data analysis concluded that: 1) an assessment of the Deed as the product of a public official, it must be done with the presumption of unauthorized or Vermoeden van rechtmatigheid or Presumptio lustae Causa, the Deed must be considered valid until there are those who claim deed is invalid then in the contested through the courts and there is a court decision that has permanent legal force 2) in the implementation of the principle of presumption valid for notaries who make Partij deed still major obstacles in the face by the Notary Public. Such constraints due to actions undertaken by the giving false information to the Notary in the process is an authentic deed, causing loss to the parties who feel aggrieved. The solution of the presumption of lawful implementation for notaries who make Partij deed is the absence of legal protection and legal justice for notaries who here become victims of false information given by to the Notary. In the event of the above, none of the violations committed by the Notary. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Notary. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Notary. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Applicant. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply.Keywords: Principle of Legal Presumption, Notary, Partij deed.","PeriodicalId":190203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akta","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/AKTA.6.4.771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to: 1) To identify and analyze the implementation of the principle of presumption valid for notaries who make Partij deed according to Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to the law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. 2) To identify and analyze problems and solutions for the implementation of a legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary according to Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to the law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by normative.Based on the results of data analysis concluded that: 1) an assessment of the Deed as the product of a public official, it must be done with the presumption of unauthorized or Vermoeden van rechtmatigheid or Presumptio lustae Causa, the Deed must be considered valid until there are those who claim deed is invalid then in the contested through the courts and there is a court decision that has permanent legal force 2) in the implementation of the principle of presumption valid for notaries who make Partij deed still major obstacles in the face by the Notary Public. Such constraints due to actions undertaken by the giving false information to the Notary in the process is an authentic deed, causing loss to the parties who feel aggrieved. The solution of the presumption of lawful implementation for notaries who make Partij deed is the absence of legal protection and legal justice for notaries who here become victims of false information given by to the Notary. In the event of the above, none of the violations committed by the Notary. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Notary. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Notary. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Applicant. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply.Keywords: Principle of Legal Presumption, Notary, Partij deed.
公证契据法律推定原则的实施依据2004年公证职位法第30号修正的2014年第2号法
本研究的目的是:1)识别和分析的实现原则推定有效公证人使Partij行为依法2014年2号30号2004年关于修改法律公证。2)来识别和分析问题和解决方案的实现一个合理的假设,一个契约Partij依法公证2号2014年关于修改2004年的30号法律关于公证。本研究使用的数据有第一手数据、二手数据和能够支持三级研究的数据,然后进行规范分析。根据数据分析结果得出:1)对作为公职人员产物的契约的评估,必须以未经授权的推定或推定的理由进行;契约必须被认为是有效的,直到有人声称契约是无效的,然后在法院的争议中,有一个具有永久法律效力的法院判决。2)在推定原则的实施中,对公证人有效,使当事人契约仍然是公证人面临的主要障碍。由于在公证过程中向公证员提供虚假信息所采取的行为是一种真实行为,给当事人造成了损失,使当事人感到委屈。公证员依法履约推定的解决之道是公证员在此成为虚假信息受害者的法律保护和法律公正的缺失。在上述情况下,公证员没有任何违规行为。因为前期事件问题的根源在于公证员的不诚信。使其合法推定的实施适用于契据公证。因为前期事件问题的根源在于公证员的不诚信。使其合法推定的实施适用于契据公证。因为前期事件问题的根源在于申请人的恶意。使其合法推定的实施适用于契据公证。关键词:法律推定原则、公证、契据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信