Improving Machine-based Entity Resolution with Limited Human Effort: A Risk Perspective

Zhaoqiang Chen, Qun Chen, Boyi Hou, Ahmed Murtadha, Zhanhuai Li
{"title":"Improving Machine-based Entity Resolution with Limited Human Effort: A Risk Perspective","authors":"Zhaoqiang Chen, Qun Chen, Boyi Hou, Ahmed Murtadha, Zhanhuai Li","doi":"10.1145/3242153.3242156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pure machine-based solutions usually struggle in the challenging classification tasks such as entity resolution (ER). To alleviate this problem, a recent trend is to involve the human in the resolution process, most notably the crowdsourcing approach. However, it remains very challenging to effectively improve machine-based entity resolution with limited human effort. In this paper, we investigate the problem of human and machine cooperation for ER from a risk perspective. We propose to select the machine-labeled instances at high risk of being mislabeled for manual verification. For this task, we present a risk model that takes into consideration the human-labeled instances as well as the output of machine resolution. Finally, we evaluate the performance of the proposed risk model on real data. Our experiments demonstrate that it can pick up the mislabeled instances with considerably higher accuracy than the existing alternatives. Provided with the same amount of human cost budget, it can also achieve better resolution quality than the state-of-the-art approach based on active learning.","PeriodicalId":407894,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Workshop on Real-Time Business Intelligence and Analytics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Workshop on Real-Time Business Intelligence and Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3242153.3242156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Pure machine-based solutions usually struggle in the challenging classification tasks such as entity resolution (ER). To alleviate this problem, a recent trend is to involve the human in the resolution process, most notably the crowdsourcing approach. However, it remains very challenging to effectively improve machine-based entity resolution with limited human effort. In this paper, we investigate the problem of human and machine cooperation for ER from a risk perspective. We propose to select the machine-labeled instances at high risk of being mislabeled for manual verification. For this task, we present a risk model that takes into consideration the human-labeled instances as well as the output of machine resolution. Finally, we evaluate the performance of the proposed risk model on real data. Our experiments demonstrate that it can pick up the mislabeled instances with considerably higher accuracy than the existing alternatives. Provided with the same amount of human cost budget, it can also achieve better resolution quality than the state-of-the-art approach based on active learning.
用有限的人力改进基于机器的实体解析:风险视角
纯基于机器的解决方案通常难以处理具有挑战性的分类任务,例如实体解析(ER)。为了缓解这个问题,最近的一种趋势是让人类参与解决问题的过程,最引人注目的是众包方法。然而,用有限的人力来有效地提高基于机器的实体解析仍然是一个非常具有挑战性的问题。本文从风险的角度研究了急诊的人机协作问题。我们建议选择被误标记风险高的机器标记实例进行人工验证。对于这项任务,我们提出了一个风险模型,该模型考虑了人工标记的实例以及机器分辨率的输出。最后,我们对所提出的风险模型在实际数据上的性能进行了评价。我们的实验表明,与现有的替代方法相比,它可以以相当高的准确率拾取错误标记的实例。在提供相同的人力成本预算的情况下,它也可以比基于主动学习的最先进的方法获得更好的分辨率质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信