Mother Nature To The Rescue?

E. Rohling
{"title":"Mother Nature To The Rescue?","authors":"E. Rohling","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190910877.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Now we come to the key issue. Many discussions about climate change turn to the well- known fact that (very) large CO2 fluctuations have happened in the geological past. This is then taken to imply that “we shouldn’t worry: nature has seen this all before, and will somehow clean up our external carbon emissions.” The veracity of this sentiment can be tested by considering the main mechanisms available in nature for extracting carbon from the atmosphere-ocean system. These are weathering, reforestation, and carbon burial in soils and sediments. In the next section, we look at the potential of these processes. Thereafter, we consider the case for human intervention, and potential ways forward. A first mechanism by which nature has dealt with past high- CO2 episodes is chemical weathering of rocks. In warmer and more humid climates, chemical weathering rates are increased, and this extracts CO2 from the atmosphere. However, CO2 removal through weathering at natural rates is an extremely slow process, which operates over hundreds of thousands to millions of years. Given time, there is no doubt that natural weathering will be capable of eventually removing the excess CO2, but this process is so slow that it offers no solace for the future, unless we are prepared to wait many hundreds of thousands of years. There may be some future in artificially increasing the weathering processes to remove anthropogenic carbon, but this is in its infancy—we will revisit this in sections 6.2 and 6.3. A second mechanism for carbon extraction from the atmosphere-ocean system concerns expansion of the biosphere, most notably through reforestation. We have discussed this before in terms of expansion and contraction of the biosphere during ice- age cycles. In today’s case, carbon extraction through biosphere expansion requires first that the industrial age’s trend of net deforestation is reversed. Interestingly, this actually may have happened at around 2003. Between 2003 and 2014, net global vegeta¬tion increased by about 4 GtC (i.e., at an average rate of about 0.4 GtC per year), due to a lucky combination of increased rainfall on the savannahs of Australia, Africa, and South America, regrowth of forests on abandoned farmland in Russia and former Soviet republics, and massive tree- planting projects in China.","PeriodicalId":266011,"journal":{"name":"The Climate Question","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Climate Question","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190910877.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Now we come to the key issue. Many discussions about climate change turn to the well- known fact that (very) large CO2 fluctuations have happened in the geological past. This is then taken to imply that “we shouldn’t worry: nature has seen this all before, and will somehow clean up our external carbon emissions.” The veracity of this sentiment can be tested by considering the main mechanisms available in nature for extracting carbon from the atmosphere-ocean system. These are weathering, reforestation, and carbon burial in soils and sediments. In the next section, we look at the potential of these processes. Thereafter, we consider the case for human intervention, and potential ways forward. A first mechanism by which nature has dealt with past high- CO2 episodes is chemical weathering of rocks. In warmer and more humid climates, chemical weathering rates are increased, and this extracts CO2 from the atmosphere. However, CO2 removal through weathering at natural rates is an extremely slow process, which operates over hundreds of thousands to millions of years. Given time, there is no doubt that natural weathering will be capable of eventually removing the excess CO2, but this process is so slow that it offers no solace for the future, unless we are prepared to wait many hundreds of thousands of years. There may be some future in artificially increasing the weathering processes to remove anthropogenic carbon, but this is in its infancy—we will revisit this in sections 6.2 and 6.3. A second mechanism for carbon extraction from the atmosphere-ocean system concerns expansion of the biosphere, most notably through reforestation. We have discussed this before in terms of expansion and contraction of the biosphere during ice- age cycles. In today’s case, carbon extraction through biosphere expansion requires first that the industrial age’s trend of net deforestation is reversed. Interestingly, this actually may have happened at around 2003. Between 2003 and 2014, net global vegeta¬tion increased by about 4 GtC (i.e., at an average rate of about 0.4 GtC per year), due to a lucky combination of increased rainfall on the savannahs of Australia, Africa, and South America, regrowth of forests on abandoned farmland in Russia and former Soviet republics, and massive tree- planting projects in China.
大自然母亲来救援?
现在我们来到关键问题。关于气候变化的许多讨论都转向了一个众所周知的事实,即在过去的地质时期发生过(非常)大的二氧化碳波动。这被认为是在暗示“我们不应该担心:大自然已经看到了这一切,并且会以某种方式清理我们外部的碳排放。”这种观点的真实性可以通过考虑自然界中从大气-海洋系统中提取碳的主要机制来检验。这些是风化,重新造林,土壤和沉积物中的碳埋藏。在下一节中,我们将研究这些流程的潜力。此后,我们考虑人为干预的情况,以及潜在的前进方向。自然界处理过去高二氧化碳期的第一种机制是岩石的化学风化作用。在更温暖和潮湿的气候中,化学风化率增加,这从大气中提取二氧化碳。然而,以自然速率通过风化去除二氧化碳是一个极其缓慢的过程,需要数十万到数百万年的时间。假以时日,毫无疑问,自然的风化作用最终将能够清除多余的二氧化碳,但这个过程太慢,对未来没有任何安慰,除非我们准备好等待数十万年。通过人为地增加风化过程来去除人为碳可能会有一些未来,但这还处于起步阶段——我们将在6.2节和6.3节中重新讨论这一点。从大气-海洋系统中提取碳的第二种机制与生物圈的扩张有关,尤其是通过重新造林。我们以前在冰期循环期间生物圈的膨胀和收缩方面讨论过这个问题。在今天的情况下,通过生物圈扩张来提取碳,首先需要扭转工业时代净森林砍伐的趋势。有趣的是,这实际上可能发生在2003年左右。2003年至2014年期间,由于澳大利亚、非洲和南美洲热带稀树大草原的降雨量增加,俄罗斯和前苏联共和国废弃农田的森林重新生长,以及中国大规模植树项目的幸运结合,全球净植被增加了约4千兆吨当量(即平均每年约0.4千兆吨当量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信