An analysis of a benchmarking initiative to help government entities to learn from best practices – the “Dubai We Learn” initiative

R. Mann, D. Adebanjo, A. Abbas, Zeyad Mohammad El Kahlout, A. Nuseirat, Hazza Khalfan Al Neaimi
{"title":"An analysis of a benchmarking initiative to help government entities to learn from best practices – the “Dubai We Learn” initiative","authors":"R. Mann, D. Adebanjo, A. Abbas, Zeyad Mohammad El Kahlout, A. Nuseirat, Hazza Khalfan Al Neaimi","doi":"10.1108/ijeg-11-2018-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the mechanisms for managing coordinated benchmarking projects and the outcomes achieved from such coordination. While there have been many independent benchmarking studies comparing the practices and performance of public sector organisations, there has been little research on initiatives that involve coordinating multiple benchmarking projects within public sector organisations or report on the practices implemented and results from benchmarking projects. This research will be of interest to centralised authorities wishing to encourage and assist multiple organisations in undertaking benchmarking projects.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study adopts a case study methodology. Data were collected on the coordinating mechanisms and the experiences of the individual organisations over a one-year period.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings show successful results (financial and non-financial) across all 13 benchmarking projects, thus indicating the success of a coordinated approach to managing multiple projects. The study concluded by recommending a six-stage process for coordinating multiple benchmarking projects.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research gives new insights into the application and benefits from benchmarking because of the open access the research team had to the “Dubai We Learn” initiative. To the authors’ knowledge the research was unique in being able to report accurately on the outcome of 13 benchmarking projects with all projects using the TRADE benchmarking methodology.\n","PeriodicalId":123016,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Excellence in Government","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Excellence in Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijeg-11-2018-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the mechanisms for managing coordinated benchmarking projects and the outcomes achieved from such coordination. While there have been many independent benchmarking studies comparing the practices and performance of public sector organisations, there has been little research on initiatives that involve coordinating multiple benchmarking projects within public sector organisations or report on the practices implemented and results from benchmarking projects. This research will be of interest to centralised authorities wishing to encourage and assist multiple organisations in undertaking benchmarking projects. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a case study methodology. Data were collected on the coordinating mechanisms and the experiences of the individual organisations over a one-year period. Findings The findings show successful results (financial and non-financial) across all 13 benchmarking projects, thus indicating the success of a coordinated approach to managing multiple projects. The study concluded by recommending a six-stage process for coordinating multiple benchmarking projects. Originality/value This research gives new insights into the application and benefits from benchmarking because of the open access the research team had to the “Dubai We Learn” initiative. To the authors’ knowledge the research was unique in being able to report accurately on the outcome of 13 benchmarking projects with all projects using the TRADE benchmarking methodology.
分析一项旨在帮助政府机构从最佳实践中学习的基准倡议——“迪拜我们学习”倡议
目的探讨协调标杆项目的管理机制和协调成果。虽然有许多独立的基准研究比较了公共部门组织的实践和绩效,但很少有研究涉及协调公共部门组织内多个基准项目的倡议,或报告实施的实践和基准项目的结果。这项研究将对希望鼓励和协助多个组织开展基准项目的中央当局感兴趣。设计/方法/方法本研究采用个案研究法。收集了有关协调机制和个别组织在一年期间的经验的数据。调查结果调查结果显示了所有13个基准测试项目的成功结果(财务和非财务),从而表明了管理多个项目的协调方法的成功。该研究最后建议了一个协调多个基准项目的六阶段流程。独创性/价值这项研究为应用提供了新的见解,并从基准测试中受益,因为研究团队对“迪拜我们学习”计划的开放访问。据作者所知,这项研究的独特之处在于能够准确报告13个基准测试项目的结果,所有项目都使用了TRADE基准测试方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信