Quality of Doctoral Education in South Africa: The Perspective of Doctoral Students at a University of Technology

R. B. Kuriakose
{"title":"Quality of Doctoral Education in South Africa: The Perspective of Doctoral Students at a University of Technology","authors":"R. B. Kuriakose","doi":"10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to test if the challenges in ensuring quality in a doctoral education are true for students enrolled for a doctoral degree in a University of Technology in South Africa. Doctoral students dependent on strong academic support from their institutions and employers to successfully complete their course. Established traditional universities in South Africa have the advantage of high income, low student ratios and permanent staff with doctorates which aid doctoral production. However, newly established Universities of Technology in South Africa are still building capacity to address these concerns. An exploratory study aided with quantitative analysis in the form of descriptive statistics is deployed among the registered doctoral students on the kind of support they get from their employers as well as their institutions. This paper showcases a thorough literature review on the topic and identified that there is very little research on the contributions of Universities of Technology with regards to doctoral student production. Key results from the study show that 75% of the students are registered for a part time study with 66% employed on a fulltime basis. Of this only 40% can meet their study tasks on time. Other key findings show that majority of students have access to courses conducted by the institution with respect to proposal writing, literature review and research methodology courses albeit it is not directly related to their field of study.","PeriodicalId":206250,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to test if the challenges in ensuring quality in a doctoral education are true for students enrolled for a doctoral degree in a University of Technology in South Africa. Doctoral students dependent on strong academic support from their institutions and employers to successfully complete their course. Established traditional universities in South Africa have the advantage of high income, low student ratios and permanent staff with doctorates which aid doctoral production. However, newly established Universities of Technology in South Africa are still building capacity to address these concerns. An exploratory study aided with quantitative analysis in the form of descriptive statistics is deployed among the registered doctoral students on the kind of support they get from their employers as well as their institutions. This paper showcases a thorough literature review on the topic and identified that there is very little research on the contributions of Universities of Technology with regards to doctoral student production. Key results from the study show that 75% of the students are registered for a part time study with 66% employed on a fulltime basis. Of this only 40% can meet their study tasks on time. Other key findings show that majority of students have access to courses conducted by the institution with respect to proposal writing, literature review and research methodology courses albeit it is not directly related to their field of study.
南非博士教育质量:一所科技大学博士生的视角
本文的目的是测试在确保博士教育质量方面的挑战对于在南非一所科技大学攻读博士学位的学生来说是否真的存在。博士研究生依赖于他们的机构和雇主的强大学术支持来成功完成他们的课程。南非老牌传统大学的优势是收入高,学生比例低,拥有博士学位的长期教职人员有助于博士学位的培养。然而,南非新成立的科技大学仍在建设能力以解决这些问题。以描述性统计的形式辅助定量分析的探索性研究,在注册博士生中部署了他们从雇主和机构获得的支持类型。本文对这一主题进行了全面的文献综述,并发现关于科技大学在博士生产出方面的贡献的研究很少。该研究的主要结果显示,75%的学生注册了兼职学习,66%的学生全职工作。其中只有40%的人能按时完成学习任务。其他主要调查结果显示,大多数学生都有机会参加该机构开设的课程,包括提案写作、文献综述和研究方法课程,尽管这些课程与他们的研究领域没有直接关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信