A BRIEF EXPLORATION OF THE ISLAMIZABLE YORUBA ART AND CULTURE

M. M. O. AL-SHAFI’I, A. Abdullahi, Kafayat Omowumi Olodo AL-SHAFI’I
{"title":"A BRIEF EXPLORATION OF THE ISLAMIZABLE YORUBA ART AND CULTURE","authors":"M. M. O. AL-SHAFI’I, A. Abdullahi, Kafayat Omowumi Olodo AL-SHAFI’I","doi":"10.22159/ijss.2023.v11i3.46800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Art and culture it is believed cannot be simply defined. This is based on the complexity of the notions and connotations they both imbibe. A similar difficulty it is faced when determining what is religious, particularly Islamic, in art and culture and what is not. Bearing in mind the complexity of both the definition and the conception, this paper attempts a general definition than can be considered by all sundry and attempts to draw closer some conceptual usages that would not be alleged as taking one beyond the boundary of religion. Islam is both an inclusive and exclusive way of life, and as such is expected to be tolerant in most cases. Art and culture derived from natural instincts would not in any way and form go against Islamic injunctions, if properly dissected and appropriately elucidated. There are many aspects of Yoruba art and culture that are still maintained both during and post adventure of Islam among the Yoruba community. Moreover, Islam has been silent on some others, not giving consent not disproving, due to lack of a direct prohibition from the Shariah law and the Muslim scholars. Art and culture cannot be strictly placed under the category of haram (prohibited acts), and it is the position of this paper that whether we like it or we like it not art and culture are both part of us and so shall we manage them with our ways of life (religion). The paper likes to conclude that the misplacement of the artistic and cultural concepts stem from the misappropriation and misrepresentation of what art and culture are and what they are not. Art and culture are just what they are, and are not what they are not, a water-concept of life that is seldom felt but hard to jettison.","PeriodicalId":254239,"journal":{"name":"Innovare Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovare Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijss.2023.v11i3.46800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Art and culture it is believed cannot be simply defined. This is based on the complexity of the notions and connotations they both imbibe. A similar difficulty it is faced when determining what is religious, particularly Islamic, in art and culture and what is not. Bearing in mind the complexity of both the definition and the conception, this paper attempts a general definition than can be considered by all sundry and attempts to draw closer some conceptual usages that would not be alleged as taking one beyond the boundary of religion. Islam is both an inclusive and exclusive way of life, and as such is expected to be tolerant in most cases. Art and culture derived from natural instincts would not in any way and form go against Islamic injunctions, if properly dissected and appropriately elucidated. There are many aspects of Yoruba art and culture that are still maintained both during and post adventure of Islam among the Yoruba community. Moreover, Islam has been silent on some others, not giving consent not disproving, due to lack of a direct prohibition from the Shariah law and the Muslim scholars. Art and culture cannot be strictly placed under the category of haram (prohibited acts), and it is the position of this paper that whether we like it or we like it not art and culture are both part of us and so shall we manage them with our ways of life (religion). The paper likes to conclude that the misplacement of the artistic and cultural concepts stem from the misappropriation and misrepresentation of what art and culture are and what they are not. Art and culture are just what they are, and are not what they are not, a water-concept of life that is seldom felt but hard to jettison.
对伊斯兰化的约鲁巴艺术和文化的简短探索
人们认为艺术和文化不能简单地定义。这是基于他们所吸收的概念和内涵的复杂性。在确定艺术和文化中什么是宗教性的,特别是伊斯兰教,什么不是宗教性的时候,也面临着类似的困难。考虑到定义和概念的复杂性,本文试图给出一个一般的定义,而不是所有人都能考虑到的定义,并试图更接近一些不会被称为超越宗教界限的概念用法。伊斯兰教是一种既包容又排外的生活方式,因此在大多数情况下应该是宽容的。源自自然本能的艺术和文化,如果得到适当的剖析和阐释,将不会以任何方式和形式违背伊斯兰教的禁令。约鲁巴艺术和文化的许多方面在约鲁巴社区的伊斯兰历险期间和之后仍然保持着。此外,由于伊斯兰教法和穆斯林学者缺乏直接的禁止,伊斯兰教对其他一些问题保持沉默,不同意也不反驳。艺术和文化不能严格地放在haram(禁止的行为)的类别下,这是本文的立场,无论我们喜欢与否,艺术和文化都是我们的一部分,所以我们应该用我们的生活方式(宗教)来管理它们。本文的结论是,艺术和文化概念的错位源于对艺术和文化是什么和不是什么的误用和歪曲。艺术和文化就是它们本来的样子,而不是它们本来的样子,这是一种很少被感觉到但很难被抛弃的水的生命概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信