Implementation of the Bethesda system of reporting thyroid cytopathology in a referral center

K. Pattnaik, Goutami Dasnayak, Asaranti Kar, S. Swain, C. Sarangi
{"title":"Implementation of the Bethesda system of reporting thyroid cytopathology in a referral center","authors":"K. Pattnaik, Goutami Dasnayak, Asaranti Kar, S. Swain, C. Sarangi","doi":"10.4103/oji.oji_39_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The introduction of the Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), following the “National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference” held in Bethesda, in 2007, offered the opportunity to establish a uniform six-tiered reporting system for thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Aim of the Study: The aim of the study was to implement and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and risk of malignancy (ROM) of categories of TBSRTC. Materials and Methods: FNA was taken from the thyroid swelling during the study period and smears were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Diff-Quik, or papanicolaou stains. Nodular thyroid swelling cases were subjected to histopathological correlation. Results: Of the 1724 FNAs, a total of 223 cases of palpable nodular thyroid swelling were studied with cytohistopathological correlations. About 13.90% of the cases were diagnosed as malignant. The ROM for Bethesda Category V and VI was 100% each, whereas it was 47.62%, 10%, and 2.82% for Category III, IV, and II, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the diagnostic accuracies of TBSRTC were 83.87%, 89.58%, 56.52%, 97.18%, and 88.79%, respectively. Conclusion: In our study, a more specific cytologic diagnosis was offered based on criteria laid down in the standardized nomenclature of the Bethesda System 2018 citing diagnostic accuracy and ROM in each category.","PeriodicalId":431823,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Journal of India","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/oji.oji_39_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction of the Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), following the “National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference” held in Bethesda, in 2007, offered the opportunity to establish a uniform six-tiered reporting system for thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Aim of the Study: The aim of the study was to implement and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and risk of malignancy (ROM) of categories of TBSRTC. Materials and Methods: FNA was taken from the thyroid swelling during the study period and smears were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Diff-Quik, or papanicolaou stains. Nodular thyroid swelling cases were subjected to histopathological correlation. Results: Of the 1724 FNAs, a total of 223 cases of palpable nodular thyroid swelling were studied with cytohistopathological correlations. About 13.90% of the cases were diagnosed as malignant. The ROM for Bethesda Category V and VI was 100% each, whereas it was 47.62%, 10%, and 2.82% for Category III, IV, and II, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the diagnostic accuracies of TBSRTC were 83.87%, 89.58%, 56.52%, 97.18%, and 88.79%, respectively. Conclusion: In our study, a more specific cytologic diagnosis was offered based on criteria laid down in the standardized nomenclature of the Bethesda System 2018 citing diagnostic accuracy and ROM in each category.
转诊中心甲状腺细胞病理报告Bethesda系统的实施
简介:贝塞斯达甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统(TBSRTC)的引入,是继2007年在贝塞斯达举行的“国家癌症研究所甲状腺细针穿刺科学状况会议”之后,为建立甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)统一的六层报告系统提供了机会。研究目的:本研究的目的是实施和评估TBSRTC分类的诊断准确性和恶性肿瘤(ROM)的风险。材料与方法:取研究期间甲状腺肿大组织的FNA,用苏木精和伊红、Diff-Quik或papanicolaou染色进行染色。甲状腺结节性肿胀病例进行组织病理学对比。结果:在1724例FNAs中,共223例可触及的甲状腺结节性肿胀进行了细胞组织病理学相关性研究。约13.90%的病例被诊断为恶性。Bethesda V类和VI类的ROM分别为100%,而III、IV和II类的ROM分别为47.62%、10%和2.82%。TBSRTC的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确率分别为83.87%、89.58%、56.52%、97.18%和88.79%。结论:在我们的研究中,根据Bethesda系统2018年标准化命名法中规定的标准,引用每个类别的诊断准确性和ROM,提供了更具体的细胞学诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信