Never mind the platform, heres the pedagogy: e-learning in environmental law

Amanda Kennedy, A. Cosby
{"title":"Never mind the platform, heres the pedagogy: e-learning in environmental law","authors":"Amanda Kennedy, A. Cosby","doi":"10.4337/9781789908534.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether adopted out of choice or necessity, e-learning will undoubtedly be a feature of the future law school landscape. This requires law teachers – including environmental law teachers – to think quite deliberately about what it means to teach online. In this chapter, we explore e-learning as a specific approach to teaching and learning that may prove useful for environmental law – but the modality, we argue, is secondary to good instructional design. As alluded to in our chapter title, our discussion focuses less on e-learning as a platform, and more on its ‘pedagogical soundness’. In our own teaching of environmental and natural resources law, we have both enjoyed positive experiences with e-learning, and we have found, like others, that ‘no sacrifice in educational quality necessarily accompanies online legal education’. Our aim in this chapter however is not to suggest that e-learning is preferable to face-to-face instruction. We hope to demonstrate that, with careful planning and selection based on learning theory and desired learning outcomes, online learning can be used to deliver a pedagogically-robust environmental law course. We begin this chapter by briefly canvassing the tools and benefits of e-learning, before focusing in detail on its pedagogical value. We then discuss some of the challenges and constraints experienced with e-learning, and offer some commentary as to how these might be traversed. Ultimately, we contend that by viewing e-learning as a distinct pedagogy, rather than just a set of technological tools to replicate face-to-face teaching practice, environmental law lecturers can draw upon an effective educational approach grounded in social collaboration, active learning and authentic assessment.","PeriodicalId":309488,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Environmental Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908534.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether adopted out of choice or necessity, e-learning will undoubtedly be a feature of the future law school landscape. This requires law teachers – including environmental law teachers – to think quite deliberately about what it means to teach online. In this chapter, we explore e-learning as a specific approach to teaching and learning that may prove useful for environmental law – but the modality, we argue, is secondary to good instructional design. As alluded to in our chapter title, our discussion focuses less on e-learning as a platform, and more on its ‘pedagogical soundness’. In our own teaching of environmental and natural resources law, we have both enjoyed positive experiences with e-learning, and we have found, like others, that ‘no sacrifice in educational quality necessarily accompanies online legal education’. Our aim in this chapter however is not to suggest that e-learning is preferable to face-to-face instruction. We hope to demonstrate that, with careful planning and selection based on learning theory and desired learning outcomes, online learning can be used to deliver a pedagogically-robust environmental law course. We begin this chapter by briefly canvassing the tools and benefits of e-learning, before focusing in detail on its pedagogical value. We then discuss some of the challenges and constraints experienced with e-learning, and offer some commentary as to how these might be traversed. Ultimately, we contend that by viewing e-learning as a distinct pedagogy, rather than just a set of technological tools to replicate face-to-face teaching practice, environmental law lecturers can draw upon an effective educational approach grounded in social collaboration, active learning and authentic assessment.
别管平台,这里有一种教学法:环境法的电子学习
无论是出于选择还是出于需要,电子学习无疑将成为未来法学院的一个特点。这就要求法律教师——包括环境法教师——认真思考在线教学意味着什么。在本章中,我们将探讨电子学习作为一种特定的教学方法,它可能被证明对环境法有用——但我们认为,这种方式次于良好的教学设计。正如本章标题所暗示的那样,我们的讨论较少关注作为平台的电子学习,而更多地关注其“教学合理性”。在我们自己教授环境和自然资源法的过程中,我们都享受到了电子学习的积极体验,我们发现,和其他人一样,“在线法律教育并不一定会牺牲教育质量”。然而,我们在本章的目的并不是建议电子学习比面对面教学更好。我们希望证明,通过基于学习理论和期望的学习成果的仔细规划和选择,在线学习可以用来提供教学上强大的环境法课程。在详细讨论电子学习的教学价值之前,我们先简要介绍一下电子学习的工具和好处。然后,我们讨论了电子学习遇到的一些挑战和限制,并就如何克服这些挑战和限制提供了一些评论。最后,我们认为,通过将电子学习视为一种独特的教学法,而不仅仅是一套复制面对面教学实践的技术工具,环境法讲师可以利用基于社会协作、主动学习和真实评估的有效教育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信