Sanctuaries in Roman Dacia: Materiality and Religious Experience. By Csaba Szabó.

P. Kató
{"title":"Sanctuaries in Roman Dacia: Materiality and Religious Experience. By Csaba Szabó.","authors":"P. Kató","doi":"10.47074/hsce.2021-2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spite of important exceptions bridging the two fields, the archaeology of the Roman provinces and the study of Roman polytheistic religion often appear even today as separate disciplines. Archaeologists dedicate most of their efforts to the publication and interpretation of the material brought to light by their excavations. On the other hand, the most innovative scholars of religious history pay more attention to theoretical approaches taken from sociology, anthropology, and religious studies than to collecting and evaluating large bodies of archaeological and epigraphic evidence. More intense dialogue between these two fields has great potential for advancing our understanding of the religious history of the ancient world. The book under review, Csaba Szabó’s doctoral dissertation defended in Erfurt and Pécs, is an attempt to achieve just this.1 Szabó aims to analyse the rich epigraphic and archaeological evidence about sanctuaries in Roman Dacia using the questions and methods developed by the Lived Ancient Religion Project (LAR), one of the most innovative research programmes in this field, headed by Jörg Rüpke at Erfurt. As will become clear from the following, Szabó often succeeds in making the epigraphic and archaeological material “speak” about religious experiences in Dacia, even if his reconstructions are not always fully convincing. Szabó’s approach is made even more important by the fact that much—often very high quality—research on Roman Dacia was published in Romanian, and therefore remains inaccessible to most foreign scholars. The Introduction (pp. 1–10) presents the main categories and methodological assumptions according to which the material regarding religion in Roman Dacia is analysed. For Szabó’s work, the most important element and major methodological innovation of the LAR project is the category of “space sacralization”, which is used","PeriodicalId":267555,"journal":{"name":"Historical Studies on Central Europe","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Studies on Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47074/hsce.2021-2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In spite of important exceptions bridging the two fields, the archaeology of the Roman provinces and the study of Roman polytheistic religion often appear even today as separate disciplines. Archaeologists dedicate most of their efforts to the publication and interpretation of the material brought to light by their excavations. On the other hand, the most innovative scholars of religious history pay more attention to theoretical approaches taken from sociology, anthropology, and religious studies than to collecting and evaluating large bodies of archaeological and epigraphic evidence. More intense dialogue between these two fields has great potential for advancing our understanding of the religious history of the ancient world. The book under review, Csaba Szabó’s doctoral dissertation defended in Erfurt and Pécs, is an attempt to achieve just this.1 Szabó aims to analyse the rich epigraphic and archaeological evidence about sanctuaries in Roman Dacia using the questions and methods developed by the Lived Ancient Religion Project (LAR), one of the most innovative research programmes in this field, headed by Jörg Rüpke at Erfurt. As will become clear from the following, Szabó often succeeds in making the epigraphic and archaeological material “speak” about religious experiences in Dacia, even if his reconstructions are not always fully convincing. Szabó’s approach is made even more important by the fact that much—often very high quality—research on Roman Dacia was published in Romanian, and therefore remains inaccessible to most foreign scholars. The Introduction (pp. 1–10) presents the main categories and methodological assumptions according to which the material regarding religion in Roman Dacia is analysed. For Szabó’s work, the most important element and major methodological innovation of the LAR project is the category of “space sacralization”, which is used
罗马达契亚的圣所:物质性与宗教经验。作者:Csaba Szabó。
尽管有一些重要的例外将这两个领域连接起来,但罗马行省考古学和罗马多神教研究即使在今天也经常作为独立的学科出现。考古学家把他们的大部分精力都投入到出版和解释他们发掘出来的材料上。另一方面,最具创新性的宗教史学者更关注社会学、人类学和宗教研究的理论方法,而不是收集和评估大量考古和碑文证据。在这两个领域之间进行更深入的对话,对于促进我们对古代世界宗教史的理解具有巨大的潜力。这本书,Csaba Szabó博士论文在埃尔福特和psamacs辩护,就是为了达到这个目的Szabó旨在分析罗马达契亚圣殿丰富的铭文和考古证据,使用由古代宗教项目(LAR)开发的问题和方法,该项目是该领域最具创新性的研究项目之一,由埃尔富特的Jörg r pke领导。从下面可以清楚地看出,Szabó经常成功地使铭文和考古材料“讲述”达契亚的宗教经历,即使他的重建并不总是完全令人信服。Szabó的研究方法更加重要的是,很多关于罗马达契亚的高质量研究都是用罗马尼亚语发表的,因此大多数外国学者仍然无法接触到。引言(第1-10页)介绍了主要类别和方法论假设,根据这些材料,有关罗马达契亚的宗教被分析。对于Szabó的工作来说,LAR项目最重要的元素和主要的方法论创新是使用了“空间神圣化”的范畴
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信