Efficacy of Oral Pilocarpine for Reduction of Post Radiotherapy Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Prospective Randomized Institution-based Study
Shivangi Agrawal, Shivani Gupta, Ravinder Singh Gothwal, R. Meena, A. Kakkar
{"title":"Efficacy of Oral Pilocarpine for Reduction of Post Radiotherapy Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Prospective Randomized Institution-based Study","authors":"Shivangi Agrawal, Shivani Gupta, Ravinder Singh Gothwal, R. Meena, A. Kakkar","doi":"10.31557/apjcc.2022.7.3.519-524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of study: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral pilocarpine concomitantly with radiation treatment for the prevention of radiation induced xerostomia in Head and Neck cancer patients. Material and methods: A prospective randomized study was carried out on 60 histopathological proven squamous cell cancer patients of Head and neck region. All patients received a total radiation dose of 66Gy /33 fraction/6.2 weeks (2Gy/fraction, 5 days/ week) on Telecobalt machine with or without concurrent chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy eligible patients received, weekly chemotherapy courses using cisplatin 30 mg/m2. Patients in the study group received oral pilocarpine 5.0 mg three times a day starting 3 days prior to start of radiotherapy and continued for 3 months post radiotherapy. Patients were evaluated on subjective basis based on Zimmerman Questionnaire and EORTC QLQ HN 35. The statistical analysis was done by Paired sample T test. Results: The average Zimmerman Xerostomia score for all parameters combined was as follows: First assessment -100mm vs 100mm; Second assessment -50mm vs 45mm; Third assessment -59mm vs 52mm; Fourth assessment -64mm vs 57mm, Fifth assessment -71mm vs 68. As per QLQ-HN 35 questionnaire used for assessment of quality of life of patients in both groups, we observed that better scores were obtained in the pilocarpine group in comparison to control group. Conclusion: In the present study, the effectiveness of Pilocarpine given during and 3 months post radiotherapy was observed in terms of better compliance during radiation treatment. Most of the patients had less subjective symptoms with lesser grades of toxicities observed during various phases of assessment post RT.","PeriodicalId":436394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcc.2022.7.3.519-524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of study: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral pilocarpine concomitantly with radiation treatment for the prevention of radiation induced xerostomia in Head and Neck cancer patients. Material and methods: A prospective randomized study was carried out on 60 histopathological proven squamous cell cancer patients of Head and neck region. All patients received a total radiation dose of 66Gy /33 fraction/6.2 weeks (2Gy/fraction, 5 days/ week) on Telecobalt machine with or without concurrent chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy eligible patients received, weekly chemotherapy courses using cisplatin 30 mg/m2. Patients in the study group received oral pilocarpine 5.0 mg three times a day starting 3 days prior to start of radiotherapy and continued for 3 months post radiotherapy. Patients were evaluated on subjective basis based on Zimmerman Questionnaire and EORTC QLQ HN 35. The statistical analysis was done by Paired sample T test. Results: The average Zimmerman Xerostomia score for all parameters combined was as follows: First assessment -100mm vs 100mm; Second assessment -50mm vs 45mm; Third assessment -59mm vs 52mm; Fourth assessment -64mm vs 57mm, Fifth assessment -71mm vs 68. As per QLQ-HN 35 questionnaire used for assessment of quality of life of patients in both groups, we observed that better scores were obtained in the pilocarpine group in comparison to control group. Conclusion: In the present study, the effectiveness of Pilocarpine given during and 3 months post radiotherapy was observed in terms of better compliance during radiation treatment. Most of the patients had less subjective symptoms with lesser grades of toxicities observed during various phases of assessment post RT.
目的:评价口服匹罗卡品联合放射治疗预防头颈部肿瘤患者放射性口干的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:对60例经组织病理学证实的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者进行前瞻性随机研究。所有患者在Telecobalt机上接受总放射剂量66Gy /33分/6.2周(2Gy/分,5天/周),伴或不伴化疗。符合同期化疗条件的患者接受顺铂30 mg/m2每周化疗疗程。研究组患者放疗前3天开始口服匹罗卡品5.0 mg,每日3次,放疗后持续3个月。采用Zimmerman问卷和EORTC QLQ HN 35对患者进行主观评价。统计分析采用配对样本T检验。结果:所有参数组合的平均Zimmerman口干评分如下:第一次评估-100mm vs 100mm;第二次评估-50mm vs 45mm;第三次评估-59mm vs 52mm;第四次评估-64mm vs 57mm,第五次评估-71mm vs 68。根据qlq - hn35问卷对两组患者的生活质量进行评估,我们观察到匹罗卡品组的评分高于对照组。结论:在本研究中,匹罗卡品在放疗期间和放疗后3个月给予的有效性,在放疗期间的依从性较好。大多数患者的主观症状较轻,在RT后评估的各个阶段观察到的毒性等级较轻。