The point prevalence and factors associated with neck pain

N. Alabdulkarim, Sarah Aljasser, Mohannad Awwad, H. Alshaalan, Reema Alshayie, Fatimah Alibrahim, W. Awwad
{"title":"The point prevalence and factors associated with neck pain","authors":"N. Alabdulkarim, Sarah Aljasser, Mohannad Awwad, H. Alshaalan, Reema Alshayie, Fatimah Alibrahim, W. Awwad","doi":"10.18502/jsp.v2i1.10679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neck pain is a significant disabling condition. Prevalence of neck pain is still not clearly stated in the literature due to the variation of its definition. It has a unique number of risk factors like history of neck pain, trauma, and certain sports injuries. In this study we measured the point prevalence of neck pain and the factors associated with it. \nMaterials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included a total of 461 participants. The collected data comprised participant characteristics: demographic, socioeconomical status, and nature of work. The Arabic Neck Disability Index was used to assess neck pain. Specific questions about possible associated factors were asked, such as duration of using electronics, type of posture, duration of reading. \nResults: The neck pain was stated by 64.6% of the study participants. The results demonstrated that participants who reported neck pain were mostly females (70.5%), single (56.6%), or had high educational level (70.2%). Slight infrequent headaches were the most significant Neck Disability Index indicator in 39.5% of the study participants. \nConclusion: The prevalence of neck pain was 64.6%, of which, mostly were females. Body postures, reading hours, work-type, and self-rated use of cellphones and PCs were all significantly associated with neck pain. Moreover, headache, concentration, and working habits were the top most significant indicators of the NDI. However, headache was the most significant.","PeriodicalId":199836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jsp.v2i1.10679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neck pain is a significant disabling condition. Prevalence of neck pain is still not clearly stated in the literature due to the variation of its definition. It has a unique number of risk factors like history of neck pain, trauma, and certain sports injuries. In this study we measured the point prevalence of neck pain and the factors associated with it. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included a total of 461 participants. The collected data comprised participant characteristics: demographic, socioeconomical status, and nature of work. The Arabic Neck Disability Index was used to assess neck pain. Specific questions about possible associated factors were asked, such as duration of using electronics, type of posture, duration of reading. Results: The neck pain was stated by 64.6% of the study participants. The results demonstrated that participants who reported neck pain were mostly females (70.5%), single (56.6%), or had high educational level (70.2%). Slight infrequent headaches were the most significant Neck Disability Index indicator in 39.5% of the study participants. Conclusion: The prevalence of neck pain was 64.6%, of which, mostly were females. Body postures, reading hours, work-type, and self-rated use of cellphones and PCs were all significantly associated with neck pain. Moreover, headache, concentration, and working habits were the top most significant indicators of the NDI. However, headache was the most significant.
颈部疼痛的穴位患病率及相关因素
背景:颈部疼痛是一种重要的致残疾病。由于其定义的变化,颈部疼痛的患病率在文献中仍未明确说明。它有一些独特的风险因素,如颈部疼痛史、创伤史和某些运动损伤史。在这项研究中,我们测量了颈部疼痛的点患病率及其相关因素。材料和方法:本横断面观察性研究共纳入461名参与者。收集的数据包括参与者的特征:人口统计、社会经济地位和工作性质。使用阿拉伯颈部残疾指数评估颈部疼痛。研究人员询问了一些可能相关因素的具体问题,比如使用电子产品的时间长短、姿势类型、阅读的时间长短。结果:64.6%的研究参与者表示颈部疼痛。结果显示,报告颈部疼痛的参与者以女性(70.5%)、单身(56.6%)和高学历(70.2%)居多。在39.5%的研究参与者中,轻微的罕见头痛是最重要的颈部残疾指数指标。结论:颈痛患病率为64.6%,以女性居多。身体姿势、阅读时间、工作类型、手机和个人电脑的自我评估使用都与颈部疼痛显著相关。此外,头痛、注意力集中和工作习惯是NDI最重要的指标。然而,头痛是最显著的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信