Improving Employment Standards Compliance: Institutional Learning and the Dual Regulatory Stream

David J. Doorey
{"title":"Improving Employment Standards Compliance: Institutional Learning and the Dual Regulatory Stream","authors":"David J. Doorey","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1791815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reasonable starting point for improving the situation of vulnerable employees is improving compliance with the Employment Standards Act. This submission deals specifically with the question of how to do that through a set of relatively modest legal reforms. The proposed reforms would, firstly, dramatically improve information flow and knowledge of ESA standards by requiring employers to learn their legal obligations and to pass on that knowledge to their employees. Secondly, the proposal would break down the traditional division between employment law and labour law by requiring that employers \"earn\" the legal rights our present labour law model confers on all employers to resist unionization by their employees. Employers who violate the ESA should forfeit the right to proselytize against collective bargaining and to insist on a certification ballot in addition to written evidence of employee support for it. By developing a dual regulatory stream model, the proposal charts a path forward that would at once increase the incentive for nonunion employers to comply with the ESA while also elevate the probability that employees of non-compliant employers will obtain the assistance of knowledgeable and skilled worker advocates.","PeriodicalId":215343,"journal":{"name":"Labor Law eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1791815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A reasonable starting point for improving the situation of vulnerable employees is improving compliance with the Employment Standards Act. This submission deals specifically with the question of how to do that through a set of relatively modest legal reforms. The proposed reforms would, firstly, dramatically improve information flow and knowledge of ESA standards by requiring employers to learn their legal obligations and to pass on that knowledge to their employees. Secondly, the proposal would break down the traditional division between employment law and labour law by requiring that employers "earn" the legal rights our present labour law model confers on all employers to resist unionization by their employees. Employers who violate the ESA should forfeit the right to proselytize against collective bargaining and to insist on a certification ballot in addition to written evidence of employee support for it. By developing a dual regulatory stream model, the proposal charts a path forward that would at once increase the incentive for nonunion employers to comply with the ESA while also elevate the probability that employees of non-compliant employers will obtain the assistance of knowledgeable and skilled worker advocates.
提高就业标准合规性:制度学习与双重监管流
改善弱势雇员处境的一个合理出发点是改善对《就业标准法》的遵守。本意见书具体论述了如何通过一套相对温和的法律改革来做到这一点的问题。拟议的改革将首先通过要求雇主了解其法律义务并将这些知识传授给其雇员,大大改善信息流动和对欧空局标准的了解。其次,该提案将打破就业法和劳动法之间的传统划分,要求雇主“获得”我们现行劳动法模式赋予所有雇主的合法权利,以抵制其雇员成立工会。违反《雇佣法》的雇主应丧失鼓吹反对集体谈判的权利,并应坚持要求进行认证投票,此外还要提供雇员支持集体谈判的书面证据。通过发展双重监管流模型,该提案描绘了一条前进的道路,它将立即增加对非工会雇主遵守ESA的激励,同时也提高了不合规雇主的雇员获得知识和熟练工人倡导者帮助的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信