"What's in the box?" - Archives, history skills and honours students

K. L. Harris, R. van der Merwe
{"title":"\"What's in the box?\" - Archives, history skills and honours students","authors":"K. L. Harris, R. van der Merwe","doi":"10.17159/2223-0386/2020/n23a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical thinking skills have become the mantra of the history profession. The aims, objectives and outcomes of history classes and courses at both secondary and tertiary level resonate with the inclusion of the skills of the historian’s craft. Primary materials are among the tools included in school teaching packs and university readers to inculcate the research dimension of history coupled to analysis, selection, critical thinking, and logical formulation. In this article we propose to reflect on a recently developed component of a postgraduate Honours module introduced in the Department of Historical and Heritage Studies at the University of Pretoria in collaboration with the University archive. This element involved students engaging with un-inventorised virgin primary documentation emanating from the Museum of the Transvaal Education Department. They were tasked with not only having to critically read the content of the “box”, but to sort, appraise and contextualize the documentation. In addition, the brief also required students to consider the research potential of the contents and present their findings at a colloquium entitled “What’s in the Box?” We argue that the success of this component of the course took the students one step further in the making of history and thus exposed them to experiential learning and what could be termed the “inner workings” of the historians’ craft.","PeriodicalId":190311,"journal":{"name":"Yesterday and Today","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yesterday and Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2223-0386/2020/n23a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historical thinking skills have become the mantra of the history profession. The aims, objectives and outcomes of history classes and courses at both secondary and tertiary level resonate with the inclusion of the skills of the historian’s craft. Primary materials are among the tools included in school teaching packs and university readers to inculcate the research dimension of history coupled to analysis, selection, critical thinking, and logical formulation. In this article we propose to reflect on a recently developed component of a postgraduate Honours module introduced in the Department of Historical and Heritage Studies at the University of Pretoria in collaboration with the University archive. This element involved students engaging with un-inventorised virgin primary documentation emanating from the Museum of the Transvaal Education Department. They were tasked with not only having to critically read the content of the “box”, but to sort, appraise and contextualize the documentation. In addition, the brief also required students to consider the research potential of the contents and present their findings at a colloquium entitled “What’s in the Box?” We argue that the success of this component of the course took the students one step further in the making of history and thus exposed them to experiential learning and what could be termed the “inner workings” of the historians’ craft.
“盒子里装的是什么?”-档案,历史技能和荣誉学生
历史思维能力已经成为历史专业人士的口头禅。中学和大学的历史课和课程的目的、目标和结果都与历史学家的技能产生了共鸣。小学教材是学校教学包和大学读本中包含的工具之一,用来灌输历史的研究维度,与分析、选择、批判性思维和逻辑表述相结合。在本文中,我们建议反思比勒陀利亚大学历史与遗产研究系与大学档案馆合作推出的研究生荣誉模块中最近开发的组成部分。这一元素涉及学生参与来自德兰士瓦教育部博物馆的未发明的原始文献。他们的任务不仅是批判性地阅读“盒子”的内容,还要对文档进行分类、评估和背景化。此外,简报还要求学生考虑内容的研究潜力,并在题为“盒子里有什么?”的研讨会上展示他们的发现。我们认为,这部分课程的成功使学生在创造历史的过程中又向前迈进了一步,从而使他们接触到经验学习,以及所谓的历史学家手艺的“内部运作”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信