High Rise Building Evacuation: Saving Lives vs. Business Continuity

Kairul Zaman Mohamed Noh, Saira Hanim Shamsi, Siang Choon Foo
{"title":"High Rise Building Evacuation: Saving Lives vs. Business Continuity","authors":"Kairul Zaman Mohamed Noh, Saira Hanim Shamsi, Siang Choon Foo","doi":"10.2118/195413-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The complexity of high rise buildings poses challenges in the event of evacuation. The multiple floors of staircases, longer egress times and large number of tenants determine the success of a complete evacuation. Most high rise buildings are well equipped with state-of-the-art safety systems. Nevertheless, untoward disasters can still occur, ranging from fires to terrorist attacks. The readiness of tenants is an area of importance as this can delay the overall course of evacuation. Identifying the causes of common delay of tenants is elemental to continuously improve evacuation rate in the event of emergencies. In view of the increased number of terrorist attacks globally in recent years, high rise building is consistently on alert as it is usually a prime target. Therefore, carrying out evacuation drill is indeed paramount to emergency preparedness. Series of full scale and functional evacuation drills are conducted at the highest twin towers in the world, PETRONAS Twin Towers (PeTT) and Tower 3. Furthermore, PeTT include various type of businesses and tenants e.g. offices, shopping mall, large underground parking bay, as well as recreational and leisure facilities. A study to look into the tenants’ behaviours was carried out in concurrence with the evacuation drill. The purpose of the study is to identify the common behaviours that contributed to the delay of the overall evacuation time. Information pertaining to the common behaviours were gathered through observation and post-mortem findings. The information obtained from this study is necessary for PeTT to continuously improve its emergency response preparedness. The series of drills are also carried out to test the Business Interruption and Continuity preparedness, e.g. activation and mobilisation of Business Continuity Teams (BCT), activation of Alternate Work Site (AWS), readiness of ICT, as well as the response time in order to reactivate the critical business functions. This paper will focus on the study conducted based on the emergency evacuation exercise carried out on 10th July 2017, mainly on the behaviours of the tenants.","PeriodicalId":425264,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195413-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complexity of high rise buildings poses challenges in the event of evacuation. The multiple floors of staircases, longer egress times and large number of tenants determine the success of a complete evacuation. Most high rise buildings are well equipped with state-of-the-art safety systems. Nevertheless, untoward disasters can still occur, ranging from fires to terrorist attacks. The readiness of tenants is an area of importance as this can delay the overall course of evacuation. Identifying the causes of common delay of tenants is elemental to continuously improve evacuation rate in the event of emergencies. In view of the increased number of terrorist attacks globally in recent years, high rise building is consistently on alert as it is usually a prime target. Therefore, carrying out evacuation drill is indeed paramount to emergency preparedness. Series of full scale and functional evacuation drills are conducted at the highest twin towers in the world, PETRONAS Twin Towers (PeTT) and Tower 3. Furthermore, PeTT include various type of businesses and tenants e.g. offices, shopping mall, large underground parking bay, as well as recreational and leisure facilities. A study to look into the tenants’ behaviours was carried out in concurrence with the evacuation drill. The purpose of the study is to identify the common behaviours that contributed to the delay of the overall evacuation time. Information pertaining to the common behaviours were gathered through observation and post-mortem findings. The information obtained from this study is necessary for PeTT to continuously improve its emergency response preparedness. The series of drills are also carried out to test the Business Interruption and Continuity preparedness, e.g. activation and mobilisation of Business Continuity Teams (BCT), activation of Alternate Work Site (AWS), readiness of ICT, as well as the response time in order to reactivate the critical business functions. This paper will focus on the study conducted based on the emergency evacuation exercise carried out on 10th July 2017, mainly on the behaviours of the tenants.
高层建筑疏散:挽救生命vs.业务连续性
高层建筑的复杂性给疏散带来了挑战。多层楼梯,较长的疏散时间和大量的租户决定了完整疏散的成功。大多数高层建筑都配备了最先进的安全系统。然而,不幸的灾难仍然可能发生,从火灾到恐怖袭击。租户的准备是一个重要的领域,因为这可以延迟整个撤离过程。确定常见的租户延迟的原因是在紧急情况下不断提高疏散率的基本要素。近年来,全球恐怖袭击事件不断增多,高层建筑一直处于警戒状态,因为它通常是主要目标。因此,进行疏散演练对应急准备确实至关重要。在世界上最高的双子塔PETRONAS双子塔(PeTT)和3号塔进行了一系列全面和功能疏散演习。此外,PeTT还包括各种类型的商业和租户,例如办公室,购物中心,大型地下停车场以及娱乐和休闲设施。在疏散演习的同时,还进行了一项调查租户行为的研究。本研究的目的是确定导致整体疏散时间延迟的常见行为。通过观察和尸检结果收集了与常见行为有关的信息。从这项研究中获得的信息对于PeTT不断改进其应急准备是必要的。此外,我们亦会进行一系列演习,以测试业务中断和业务连续性的准备工作,例如启动和调动业务连续性小组、启动备用工作地点、资讯及通讯科技的准备工作,以及恢复关键业务功能所需的反应时间。本文将重点研究基于2017年7月10日进行的紧急疏散演习的研究,主要是关于租户的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信