„Cały świat – samo życie”. Rola materii w malarstwie Tadeusza Kantora w latach 1945–1964

J. Cieślak, Wiktoria Kozioł, Magdalena Kunińska
{"title":"„Cały świat – samo życie”. Rola materii w malarstwie Tadeusza Kantora w latach 1945–1964","authors":"J. Cieślak, Wiktoria Kozioł, Magdalena Kunińska","doi":"10.14746/AQ.2018.29.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of the paper is the idea of matter in Tadeusz Kantor’s painting after World War II, including metaphorical painting, the informel, and the painting of the matter (1945-1964). The artist defined matter as an indeterminate, universal foundation which is a vehicle of the attributes of all that can be perceived by the senses, both animate bodies and inanimate things. A starting point are Kantor’s own texts – his notes and publications reflecting particular stages of his artistic evolution, critical essays on art, as well as later statements referring to the period under scrutiny. The present analysis is an attempt to find out whether Kantor’s postulates were really reflected in his art. Its main goal is to reconstruct his line of reasoning concerning matter and focus on the activities rooted in his theories, which is why contemporary reception and interpretations of his painting have not been taken into account. The frame of reference includes philosophical and artistic ideas known to Kantor or available to the artistic circles of the period. The text has been divided into four parts corresponding to particular stages of the artist’s development: (1) 1945-1947, when Kantor was trying to find ways of artistic expression beyond traditional topics of painting, such as the human figure, (2) 1947-1954, the metaphorical period, when, as a result of his visit to the Palais de la Découverte, he tried to represent the world invisible to the eye, (3) 1955-1959, the informelperiod, when paint became for him an equivalent of the matter, a synecdoche, one substance symbolizing all of it, and (4) 1958-1964, painting of the matter, when he kept using also other substances added to paint and chose a “concrete” approach to the painting’s meaning. The authors argue that over the first two decades following World War II Kantor succeeded in creating a new kind of painting, corresponding to the present, in which matter was to be dominant. To achieve that goal, for many years he was experimenting with different ways of representing matter – its ruling forces and principles. His initial existential observations, which challenged the uniqueness of humans in the universe, were later supplemented by shocking contact with science at the Paris Museum of Inventions. In the next decade, Kantor stopped making references to science and accepted process as a basic method of reaching the ontological foundation of the world, i.e. “matter.” His art was no longer “production,” but turned into “action.” At the last stage under consideration, he decided that the painting must not present signs referring to reality beyond it. He rejected the idea of painting as illusion and mediation, claiming that the matter of art is concrete, that it becomes “what it is.”","PeriodicalId":345400,"journal":{"name":"Artium Quaestiones","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artium Quaestiones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/AQ.2018.29.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topic of the paper is the idea of matter in Tadeusz Kantor’s painting after World War II, including metaphorical painting, the informel, and the painting of the matter (1945-1964). The artist defined matter as an indeterminate, universal foundation which is a vehicle of the attributes of all that can be perceived by the senses, both animate bodies and inanimate things. A starting point are Kantor’s own texts – his notes and publications reflecting particular stages of his artistic evolution, critical essays on art, as well as later statements referring to the period under scrutiny. The present analysis is an attempt to find out whether Kantor’s postulates were really reflected in his art. Its main goal is to reconstruct his line of reasoning concerning matter and focus on the activities rooted in his theories, which is why contemporary reception and interpretations of his painting have not been taken into account. The frame of reference includes philosophical and artistic ideas known to Kantor or available to the artistic circles of the period. The text has been divided into four parts corresponding to particular stages of the artist’s development: (1) 1945-1947, when Kantor was trying to find ways of artistic expression beyond traditional topics of painting, such as the human figure, (2) 1947-1954, the metaphorical period, when, as a result of his visit to the Palais de la Découverte, he tried to represent the world invisible to the eye, (3) 1955-1959, the informelperiod, when paint became for him an equivalent of the matter, a synecdoche, one substance symbolizing all of it, and (4) 1958-1964, painting of the matter, when he kept using also other substances added to paint and chose a “concrete” approach to the painting’s meaning. The authors argue that over the first two decades following World War II Kantor succeeded in creating a new kind of painting, corresponding to the present, in which matter was to be dominant. To achieve that goal, for many years he was experimenting with different ways of representing matter – its ruling forces and principles. His initial existential observations, which challenged the uniqueness of humans in the universe, were later supplemented by shocking contact with science at the Paris Museum of Inventions. In the next decade, Kantor stopped making references to science and accepted process as a basic method of reaching the ontological foundation of the world, i.e. “matter.” His art was no longer “production,” but turned into “action.” At the last stage under consideration, he decided that the painting must not present signs referring to reality beyond it. He rejected the idea of painting as illusion and mediation, claiming that the matter of art is concrete, that it becomes “what it is.”
本文的主题是第二次世界大战后塔德乌什·坎特绘画中的物质观念,包括隐喻绘画、非正式绘画和物质绘画(1945-1964)。艺术家将物质定义为一种不确定的、普遍的基础,它是所有可以被感官感知的属性的载体,包括有生命的物体和无生命的物体。一个起点是坎特自己的文本——他的笔记和出版物反映了他的艺术发展的特定阶段,对艺术的批评文章,以及后来的声明,指的是被审查的时期。本文的分析是试图找出坎特的假设是否真的反映在他的艺术中。它的主要目标是重建他关于物质的推理路线,并关注植根于他的理论的活动,这就是为什么他的绘画没有考虑到当代的接受和解释。参考框架包括康德所知的哲学和艺术思想,或当时艺术界所能得到的思想。文章分为四个部分,对应于艺术家发展的特定阶段:(1) 1945 - 1947年,当坎特试图找到方法的艺术表现超越传统的绘画主题,如人类的图,(2)1947 - 1954,隐喻的时期,时,由于他的参观展览地探索皇宫变成,他试图代表世界看不见眼睛,(3)1955 - 1959,informelperiod,当涂料成为对他同等的重要,提喻,一个物质象征着所有,和(4)1958 - 1964,绘画,当他继续使用其他添加到绘画中的物质时,他选择了一种“具体”的方法来表达绘画的意义。作者认为,在第二次世界大战后的头二十年里,坎特成功地创造了一种新的绘画,与现在相对应,在这种绘画中,物质占主导地位。为了实现这一目标,多年来他一直在尝试用不同的方式来表现物质——它的支配力量和原则。他最初的存在主义观察挑战了人类在宇宙中的独特性,后来又在巴黎发明博物馆与科学进行了令人震惊的接触。在接下来的十年里,康德不再提及科学,而是接受过程作为达到世界本体论基础的基本方法,即“物质”。他的艺术不再是“生产”,而是变成了“行动”。在考虑的最后阶段,他决定这幅画不能表现出超越它的现实的迹象。他拒绝了绘画是幻觉和中介的想法,声称艺术的问题是具体的,它成为“它是什么”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信