Features of clinical reasoning in physical rehabilitation

Yuriy P. Zverev, Tatyana V. Builova
{"title":"Features of clinical reasoning in physical rehabilitation","authors":"Yuriy P. Zverev, Tatyana V. Builova","doi":"10.36425/rehab109897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the clinical reasoning of specialists in the field of physical rehabilitation, in particular, specialists in physical therapy and occupational therapy. Despite numerous studies, the topic of \"formation of clinical thinking\" remains insufficiently studied and has its own peculiarities in the field of physical therapy. \nThe key features influencing clinical reasoning in physical rehabilitation are revealed. They include the use of movement as one of the main means of diagnosis, rehabilitation, evaluation of effectiveness, as well as the goals of rehabilitation interventions; focus on patient activity and participation (according to the International Classification of Functioning, ICF); patient mobility; interactivity and multidisciplinarity. The autonomy extend in professional activity has a significant impact on the formation of clinical reasoning of specialists. \nConceptually, clinical reasoning in physical rehabilitation may be defined as the combination and interaction of cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills. At the same time, effective clinical reasoning is narrative, adaptive and collaborative, contextual and it utilizes a biopsychosocial approach to the patient.","PeriodicalId":142894,"journal":{"name":"Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab109897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the clinical reasoning of specialists in the field of physical rehabilitation, in particular, specialists in physical therapy and occupational therapy. Despite numerous studies, the topic of "formation of clinical thinking" remains insufficiently studied and has its own peculiarities in the field of physical therapy. The key features influencing clinical reasoning in physical rehabilitation are revealed. They include the use of movement as one of the main means of diagnosis, rehabilitation, evaluation of effectiveness, as well as the goals of rehabilitation interventions; focus on patient activity and participation (according to the International Classification of Functioning, ICF); patient mobility; interactivity and multidisciplinarity. The autonomy extend in professional activity has a significant impact on the formation of clinical reasoning of specialists. Conceptually, clinical reasoning in physical rehabilitation may be defined as the combination and interaction of cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills. At the same time, effective clinical reasoning is narrative, adaptive and collaborative, contextual and it utilizes a biopsychosocial approach to the patient.
物理康复临床推理的特点
本文对物理康复领域专家,特别是物理治疗和职业治疗专家的临床推理进行了分析。尽管有大量的研究,但“临床思维的形成”这一主题在物理治疗领域的研究仍然不够充分,并且有其自身的特殊性。揭示了影响肢体康复临床推理的关键特征。它们包括使用运动作为诊断、康复、有效性评估的主要手段之一,以及康复干预的目标;关注患者的活动和参与(根据国际功能分类,ICF);病人流动;交互性和多学科性。专业活动中的自主性延伸对专科医生临床推理能力的形成有重要影响。从概念上讲,物理康复中的临床推理可以定义为认知、情感和精神运动技能的结合和相互作用。同时,有效的临床推理是叙述性的、适应性的、协作性的、情境性的,它利用生物心理社会方法来对待病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信