Equity

B. Mcfarlane
{"title":"Equity","authors":"B. Mcfarlane","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter assesses the relationship between Equity and the New Private Law. It addresses two general questions. The first is what the New Private Law can do for Equity. Recent work on Equity not only exemplifies the significance of the New Private Law but is also vital to justifying the continued distinctiveness of Equitable, as opposed to common law, principles. The second general question is what Equity can do for the New Private Law. If Equity owes much to the New Private Law, the reverse is also true. The distinctiveness of private law lies in the correlative nature of the legal relations it recognizes. By recognizing that duties and liabilities of a defendant correlate to rights of a claimant, it places the claimant in a powerful position. If, then, the distinctiveness of private law lies in the bilateral relationship between defendant and claimant, justifying that distinctiveness requires the identification of mechanisms to deal with the risks created by such a relationship. And Equity provides just such mechanisms. Specific Equitable principles play an important role in justifying the operation of key private law rules, as those Equitable principles mitigate potential specific injustices, as between claimant and defendant, that would otherwise arise from those primary private law rules.","PeriodicalId":337737,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter assesses the relationship between Equity and the New Private Law. It addresses two general questions. The first is what the New Private Law can do for Equity. Recent work on Equity not only exemplifies the significance of the New Private Law but is also vital to justifying the continued distinctiveness of Equitable, as opposed to common law, principles. The second general question is what Equity can do for the New Private Law. If Equity owes much to the New Private Law, the reverse is also true. The distinctiveness of private law lies in the correlative nature of the legal relations it recognizes. By recognizing that duties and liabilities of a defendant correlate to rights of a claimant, it places the claimant in a powerful position. If, then, the distinctiveness of private law lies in the bilateral relationship between defendant and claimant, justifying that distinctiveness requires the identification of mechanisms to deal with the risks created by such a relationship. And Equity provides just such mechanisms. Specific Equitable principles play an important role in justifying the operation of key private law rules, as those Equitable principles mitigate potential specific injustices, as between claimant and defendant, that would otherwise arise from those primary private law rules.
股本
本章主要考察衡平法与新私法的关系。它解决了两个一般性问题。首先是新私法对衡平法的影响。最近关于衡平法的工作不仅体现了新私法的重要性,而且对于证明衡平法原则相对于普通法原则的持续独特性也是至关重要的。第二个普遍问题是衡平法能为新私法做些什么。如果说衡平法很大程度上归功于《新私法》,那么反过来也是如此。私法的独特性在于它所承认的法律关系的关联性。通过承认被告的义务和责任与索赔人的权利相关联,它使索赔人处于强有力的地位。如果私法的特殊性在于被告和索赔人之间的双边关系,那么证明这种特殊性就需要确定处理这种关系所产生的风险的机制。公平就提供了这样的机制。具体衡平法原则在证明关键私法规则运作的合理性方面发挥着重要作用,因为这些公平原则减轻了潜在的具体不公正,如在原告和被告之间,否则这些主要私法规则就会产生这种不公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信