Soft Tissue Parameters and Esthetic Index Changes in Platform Switching Implant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wen-Yi Wei Wen-Yi Wei, Yu-Hsuan Chen Wen-Yi Wei, Chia-Dan Cheng Yu-Hsuan Chen, Yu Hsiao Chia-Dan Cheng, Cheng-En Sung Yu Hsiao, Guo-Liang Cheng Cheng-En Sung, Wan-Chien Cheng Guo-Liang Cheng
{"title":"Soft Tissue Parameters and Esthetic Index Changes in Platform Switching Implant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Wen-Yi Wei Wen-Yi Wei, Yu-Hsuan Chen Wen-Yi Wei, Chia-Dan Cheng Yu-Hsuan Chen, Yu Hsiao Chia-Dan Cheng, Cheng-En Sung Yu Hsiao, Guo-Liang Cheng Cheng-En Sung, Wan-Chien Cheng Guo-Liang Cheng","doi":"10.53106/261634032022040501005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to critically evaluate the available literature to statistically analyze the effects of platform matched (PM) and platform switching (PS) implants on the peri-implant soft tissue changes and esthetic outcomes. Materials and methods: Electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed were searched for human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with clearly outcome measurement in comparison between PM and PS implant. Primary outcomes included midfacial keratinized gingiva (KG) thickness, width of KG, marginal gingiva height gain, papilla height, and pink esthetic score. Secondary outcomes included bone level, probing depth, plaque index, and sulcus bleeding index. All the included studies had to follow up for at least 1 year after function. Results: A total of 7 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Midfacial KG thickness (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.34 mm, P < 0.0001), marginal gingiva height (WMD = 0.30 mm, P = 0.01), papilla height (WMD = 0.18 mm, P = 0.003), bone level (WMD = 0.34 mm, P < 0.00001) and probing depth (WMD = -0.22 mm, P = 0.002) demonstrated statistically difference in comparison of PS and PM implants. The result of width of KG (P = 0.92), PES score (P = 0.73), plaque index (P = 0.97) and sulcus bleeding index (P = 0.78) showed no statistical difference. Conclusion: Meta-analysis showed better performance of midfacial KG thickness, marginal gingiva height and papilla height in PS implant than that in PM implants. No statistically difference was found in width of KG and PES score between PS implants and PM implants.\n \n","PeriodicalId":150986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022040501005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to critically evaluate the available literature to statistically analyze the effects of platform matched (PM) and platform switching (PS) implants on the peri-implant soft tissue changes and esthetic outcomes. Materials and methods: Electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed were searched for human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with clearly outcome measurement in comparison between PM and PS implant. Primary outcomes included midfacial keratinized gingiva (KG) thickness, width of KG, marginal gingiva height gain, papilla height, and pink esthetic score. Secondary outcomes included bone level, probing depth, plaque index, and sulcus bleeding index. All the included studies had to follow up for at least 1 year after function. Results: A total of 7 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Midfacial KG thickness (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.34 mm, P < 0.0001), marginal gingiva height (WMD = 0.30 mm, P = 0.01), papilla height (WMD = 0.18 mm, P = 0.003), bone level (WMD = 0.34 mm, P < 0.00001) and probing depth (WMD = -0.22 mm, P = 0.002) demonstrated statistically difference in comparison of PS and PM implants. The result of width of KG (P = 0.92), PES score (P = 0.73), plaque index (P = 0.97) and sulcus bleeding index (P = 0.78) showed no statistical difference. Conclusion: Meta-analysis showed better performance of midfacial KG thickness, marginal gingiva height and papilla height in PS implant than that in PM implants. No statistically difference was found in width of KG and PES score between PS implants and PM implants.  
平台切换种植体的软组织参数和美学指标变化:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:本研究的目的是进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以批判性地评估现有文献,统计分析平台匹配(PM)和平台切换(PS)种植体对种植体周围软组织改变和美学结果的影响。材料和方法:检索Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL和PubMed的电子数据库,检索PM与PS植入物比较结果测量明确的人类随机对照试验(rct)。主要结果包括面中角化牙龈(KG)厚度、KG宽度、边缘牙龈高度增加、乳头高度和粉红色美观评分。次要结果包括骨水平、探探深度、斑块指数和沟出血指数。所有纳入的研究都必须在功能恢复后至少随访1年。结果:meta分析共纳入7项rct。面中KG厚度(加权平均差(WMD) = 1.34 mm, P < 0.0001)、龈缘高度(WMD = 0.30 mm, P = 0.01)、乳头高度(WMD = 0.18 mm, P = 0.003)、骨水平(WMD = 0.34 mm, P < 0.00001)、探入深度(WMD = -0.22 mm, P = 0.002)与PS种植体比较均有统计学差异。KG宽度(P = 0.92)、PES评分(P = 0.73)、斑块指数(P = 0.97)、沟出血指数(P = 0.78)差异无统计学意义。结论:荟萃分析显示,PS种植体在面中KG厚度、龈缘高度和乳头高度方面优于PM种植体。PS种植体与PM种植体的KG宽度和PES评分无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信